evillawyer
Kung Fu Kamala, B*tches!
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 31,876
- Likes
- 21,089
@hog88 can handle it or @NorthDallas40 either oneThe yacht would have to be planted out behind Calhoun's - couldn't trust anybody here to dock it without wiping out the rest of the Vol Navy.
And how effective are those guns going to ultimately be? I think what is being proven is that unless you are equally armed - planes, bombs, etc.....it doesn't really matter; especially when facing a foe who has no problem with the death of innocents and the complete destruction of entire cities.1. Too little, too late. It should not have taken this for the people there to have that right
2. Will this inspire other NATO countries in Europe to give their citizens the same rights? I mean, Russian invasion is a serious threat, right? Yeah, we know the answer to that. No 2A in NATO countries
3. Will these warhawk neo-liberals now have a change of heart here in the states? Yea, we know the answer to that one, also.
Vietnam vs. USA, Afghans vs USSR, Afghans vs USAAnd how effective are those guns going to ultimately be? I think what is being proven is that unless you are equally armed - planes, bombs, etc.....it doesn't really matter; especially when facing a foe who has no problem with the death of innocents and the complete destruction of entire cities.
Lol
This was silly to argue before the invasion, but it’s basically childish to argue it after seeing the response of the Ukrainian people to the invaders. The Ukrainian’s ousted their puppet president, not Langley. It’s not surprising Lukashenko-lite fled to Russia.
EU considers energy sanctions on Russia after nuclear power plant attack
- EU foreign affairs ministers are meeting Friday in Brussels to discuss next steps as Moscow continues to bombard Ukraine.
- Three European officials, who did not want to be named due to the sensitivity of the talks, told CNBC that ministers will be looking at imposing energy sanctions on Russia when they meet.
- Russia is a crucial source of energy for the EU.
- In 2021, the European Union imported around 45% of gas from the country, according to the International Energy Agency.
Bipartisan calls for Russian oil ban meet resistance from White House
Bipartisan calls are growing on Capitol Hill for the United States to ban imports of oil from Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, but the White House stopped short of an outright ban -- and experts said the impact would be limited.
The United States and other Western nations have imposed an unprecedented raft of sanctions on Russia, but they have created exceptions for the oil and gas sector -- from which the Russian government derives much of its income -- because of fears cutting off the supply would drive up energy prices around the world.
But Republican members of Congress have for weeks been calling for a ban on imports of Russian crude oil and petroleum products, saying it would kneecap Russian President Vladimir Putin more than the Biden administration's sanctions have so far.
"Putin's major source of revenue is selling oil and gas and Biden's given an exception," Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said Wednesday. "You can continue getting billions of dollars to fund the invasion of Ukraine."
# # #
Gotta say I agree with the GOP on this one. Oil will spike to $150+/barrel and it'll hurt at the pump in the short run ($5.00+ gas) but if it chokes Russia into complete economic ruin (READ: Putin gets booted), I'm OK with it for now. Of note, it appears alot of Democrats also favor this approach.
Bonus: US oil and gas industry fills in the global supply void.
Make it happen Joe.
You said they had to be “equally armed” to be effective. They weren’t and it wasn’t even close. You had the world’s two most powerful empires getting their asses kicked by peasant armies armed with little more than personal armaments.lol....They were armed with more than guns protected by 2A.....are you trying to prove my point.
But please, let's not let this move to a 2A debate.
We need a boat trailer for it so someone needs to get started@hog88 can handle it or @NorthDallas40 either one
Because we were not prepared to indiscriminately murder tens of thousands of innocent civilians and bomb entire cities into oblivion......as is Putin.You said they had to be “equally armed” to be effective. They weren’t and it wasn’t even close. You had the world’s two most powerful empires getting their asses kicked by peasant armies armed with little more than personal armaments.
So Russia wants "neutral" buffer states but really that means aligned with Russia. Nothing was stopping Russia from sponsoring some neutrality program they werent a part of to those nations it wanted neutral. Could have easily pushed diplomatically for a third party instead of pushing the dichotomy.Russia... interesting. Well lets look at history. Poland, France and Germany have been just as much of a threat (if not more so) to Russia than the other way around. So with these mutual spats, wouldn't the sensible and pragmatic option be to go to separate corners or have buffers between Russia and everyone else? How is providing a buffer zone between the two spheres unreasonable?
Also, are you sure its just Russia? As you read this, keep in mind of what NATO stands for (North Atlantic Treaty Organization)...
NATO’s Pivot to China: A Challenging Path
Those crafty Chinese... moving China closer to Europe. So they feel threatened. Hmmmm... isn't that interesting. So when China moves closer to Europe, NATO feels compelled to get more concerned. But when NATO moves east to Russia, we expect Russia to not have the same concerns?
Europe’s Overlooked Missile Defence Dilemma
OK so here, the claim is that Iran poses a threat to NATO. I suppose those damn Iranians are moving closer to Europe and America, also. So now they feel threatened.
That is likely what will happen now, maybe not Ukraine but if anyone was on the fence they aren't now. Putin has made his point, if he attempts to push this much further the world will be forced to take a stand.That goes both ways. Ukraine was being used to expand NATO. I don’t think it’s super hard to figure out that Putin is not going to allow a NATO force to be built up on its western and southern borders.
Because we were not prepared to indiscriminately murder tens of thousands of innocent civilians and bomb entire cities into oblivion......as is Putin.