DonjoVol
Sudoku Master
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2012
- Messages
- 6,332
- Likes
- 3,940
Ukrainian Woman Claims Russian Troops Raping Women In Kherson
A Ukrainian resident of the Russian-controlled city of Kherson said the occupying troops have “already started to rape our women.”
Svetlana Zorina, 27, who lives with her grandmother in the Black Sea port city of about 290,000 people captured Wednesday, spoke with CNN about the dire situation and accused the invading forces of sexually attacking women.
“They already started to rape our women. There was information from people that I personally know that a 17-year-old girl — it happened to her and then they killed her,” she told host John Berman on Friday. These claims have not yet been independently verified.
Asked if city residents have mounted any resistance, she said that all people can do is “just to sit at home and take care of ourselves because we are scared.”
Zorina added: “We are terrified and scared but we are not going to give up.”
Ukrainian woman Svetlana Zorina claims Russian troops raping women in occupied city of Kherson
Poland. 1069 they invaded Ukraine/Kiev. 1605 to 1618 they took Moscow after they were invaded first.Russia... interesting. Well lets look at history. Poland, France and Germany have been just as much of a threat (if not more so) to Russia than the other way around. So with these mutual spats, wouldn't the sensible and pragmatic option be to go to separate corners or have buffers between Russia and everyone else? How is providing a buffer zone between the two spheres unreasonable?
Also, are you sure its just Russia? As you read this, keep in mind of what NATO stands for (North Atlantic Treaty Organization)...
NATO’s Pivot to China: A Challenging Path
Those crafty Chinese... moving China closer to Europe. So they feel threatened. Hmmmm... isn't that interesting. So when China moves closer to Europe, NATO feels compelled to get more concerned. But when NATO moves east to Russia, we expect Russia to not have the same concerns?
Europe’s Overlooked Missile Defence Dilemma
OK so here, the claim is that Iran poses a threat to NATO. I suppose those damn Iranians are moving closer to Europe and America, also. So now they feel threatened.
So from what I'm hearing people say in this thread then there should be almost near unanimous agreement that we never should have invaded Iraq, Afghanistan and never should have gotten involved in Syria. Glad to see the majority of you realize that now.
"Long range" at that time was a couple of hundred yards. We were not equally armed, but we evened the playing field using what later became known as guerilla tactics.We had the same number of planes and long range missiles. Pretty much equal ability for indiscriminate long range murder and destruction.
lol...
You may want to reference the bolded portion of my post.
Like I said, I have no desire to let this be derailed by Raz into a 2a debate.“ Equally armed “.. nobody had planes then. They had better weapons ( cannons that fired missiles ) more and better pistols and long rifles , more men and were the greatest military force in the world at that time . . We are talking about a good argument for the 2a which you think is absurd . I don’t think any human being should have to wait just hours before being invaded for their government to approve a right to bear arms . That is what seems absurd to me .
It's weird seeing this level of brutality in a European country modern day. This is the kind of stuff you would expect to see in some Middle Eastern craphole or Europe during WWII.This is completely believable. They are going to have to be brutal to attempt to get people to fall in line.
So now that the Russians are inexorably moving forward (as even Ukrainian leadership and probably most real military guys knew they would) the propaganda phase of the Ukrainian Hero will take a back seat to Ukrainian Suffering.
Whereas in the early going all you saw were dead Russians that the heroic forces of Ukraine killed, while losses to Ukr forces were nowhere to be found - now expect to see much more of the blood bath to civilians, old and young, who were caught in the wrong time and place, casualties of war. Crying over dead children, blown apart, the haggard faces and hollow stares of shell shocked humanity staggering about. This is the next phase of information to be filmed and distributed.
Understand that it doesnt mean that isnt true, isnt horrific, though as we have seen already, there will be a number of sensational items that are staged or faked. But in the end, understand what the purpose is. Ukraine has few weapons to fight this war against a much more powerful foe. The main one they have is our humanity, which they will use to try to drag the west into the war to fight Russia for them. They will use their (very real) suffering to gain sympathy and such frustration with inaction that our weak and foolish leaders will enter the fight. It has worked before and Zelenskyy is doing his best to be a Ukrainian Churchill. Expect our own media (right and left) to breathlessly report and magnify each depredation.
You cannot blame them. War has no rules but survival and they are a country that will soon no longer have independent governance and whose leadership will surely be on trial in Moscow. But as every lifeguard knows, drowning people may kill you to save themselves.
I say this only in the hopes that the west is not so foolish. 377k people have died in Yemen and as many as 100k in Tigray in wars that are still ongoing as we speak and yet America will not be entering those fights. Indeed, I suspect 95% of the people who read my post will not have even known that those wars exist and are ongoing.
For the chicken hawks who shriek that he is headed for Poland or the Baltics next, your slip is showing. The Baltics would have been much easier for Putin to take in the first place but he understands that guarantees Nato's involvement. While he is no doubt willing to sacrifice even 10s of thousands of troops to take Ukraine, he has no illusions against openly attacking NATO in a conventional war, and knows that nuclear wars have no winner. Nukes give Russia itself a shield but not his armies. If he can successfully take Ukraine and hold it, whether directly or as a puppet state, he will have shown his military strength and that Russia is to be feared, without risking a multipower war which he is likely to lose. Meanwhile he has to suck up the sanctions, perhaps for years but probably figures in 5-10 years or so, it will have been well worth it.
I wish all this were not so but wishing does not make it change. As I said to someone else, long ago who wished war had not happened in their own time - "So do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.”
It's weird seeing this level of brutality in a European country modern day. This is the kind of stuff you would expect to see in some Middle Eastern craphole or Europe during WWII.
I am split on Afghanistan, at least in terms of the 20 year military presence. Iraq a definite no, and a likely no in Syria but it's complicated
At least he could afford ropeSpeculation Swirls in wake of Ukrainian Billionaire's Mysterious Suicide in London mansion
The apparent suicide of a Ukrainian oil and gas oligarch earlier this week in his $25 million London mansion is under investigation, and his friends believe his death is somehow connected to Russia's invasion of his homeland.
Mikhail Watford, 66, was found hanged in his garage by his gardener in his luxurious Surrey home Monday. The death was not revealed for several days, and when police divulged it, they deemed it "unexplained, but not suspicious." Still, Watford's horrified friends are giving voice to grim speculation he may have acted because he believed he was on a hit list drawn up in Moscow.
“I find it hard to believe that Misha would have taken his own life," an unnamed neighbor told the Sun. "It doesn’t add up.”
The woman said Watford had been good friends with Russian billionaire Boris Berezovsky, who was found hanged at his nearby home in 2013, and claimed Watford had confided in her that he feared he was on Vladimir Putin's hit list.
Speculation swirls in wake of Ukrainian billionaire's mysterious suicide in London mansion
Then set up a third party. Separate from Russia and NATO.That goes both ways. Ukraine was being used to expand NATO. I don’t think it’s super hard to figure out that Putin is not going to allow a NATO force to be built up on its western and southern borders.
Afghanistan and Iraq nah. The guy we were after was Saudi Arabian found in Saudi Arabia. That was the place to go not where we did.So from what I'm hearing people say in this thread then there should be almost near unanimous agreement that we never should have invaded Iraq, Afghanistan and never should have gotten involved in Syria. Glad to see the majority of you realize that now.