Was a DOJ special council appointed three years ago to investigate alleged wrong doings, or was that my imagination?
Sorry if our system of laws and processes don't suit your political preferences.
Actually, five years ago in May 2017 with FBI's Crossfire Hurricane investigation as foundation. Let's review:
J. Brennan briefed Obama and security officials, FBIs Comey and Strzok in July 2016 that H. Clinton was running a propaganda operation to smear Trump with a narrative of being a Russian asset. He also alerted FBI twice that Carter Page was an asset, no later than July 2016. The Steele dossier we know to be Russian propaganda because Steele's Russian 'source' Igor Danchenko told FBI during a Jan 2017 interview that Steele's dossier was a fictitious work of Steele's doing, not his. He has been indicted by SC J. Durham. This is why B. Barr stated the FBI knew, at latest, in Jan 2017 there was no basis for further investigation. Directors Comey, then McCabe, ignored the warnings, pressed on to use the Clinton smear campaign, and illegally use the dossier to get and extend FISA warrants on Carter Page, and thus the campaign. Both directors were fired for leaking classified info and perjury.
Brennan went on to highlight the dossier in the Jan 2017 ICA to give it a veneer of legitimacy.
Do these 'laws and processes suit you'?
OIGs - Office of General Inspector - have no criminal powers, can't talk to people outside their departmental silos or former employees, and have no power to compel testimony/cooperation. Even hamstrung thus, IG Horowitz's Dec 2019 report was damning in baring how falsification and excluding exculpatory information was employed by FBI; when asked by Sen. Crapo if such gross misconduct petitioning for FISA warrants could be accidental or simple negligence:
- IG Horowitz’s Answer: “I’d be skeptical, but I understand why others might be skeptical of that. There is such a range of conduct here that is inexplicable and the answers we got were not satisfactory. We’re still trying to understand how all these errors could happen over 9 months and 3 handpicked teams, and the highest profile case in the FBI, while involving a presidential campaign.”
Horowitz stated he can not rule out bias given the recurring inability of those interviewed to provide satisfactory explanations. He agreed people, at minimum, should be fired. Acknowledging the FISA request falsification by FBI counsel, he concurred with Graham that the renewal of the warrant was under false pretense
and therefore constituted *illegal surveillance*.
That report tipped two FISC judges _ Boasberg and Collyer - who torched the FBI's warrant applications, going so far to term the Carter Page applications
"without legal basis" ; that is,
they did not act lawfully. FBI attorney Clinesmith was convicted of falsifying the application to hide the fact that CIA told FBI OGC/Comey/Strzok on at least two occasions that Carter Page was an agency asset. FBI personnel involved in the applications were banned from FISC applications.
Are these laws and processes we should find suitable?
Again, as Barr stated, FBI knew there was no evidence in Jan 2017 but doubled down in an attempt to get at the president any way they could.
And today, we know the Alfa bank story was not just coincidental ad traffic, but another creation of Democrat operatives, first pushed forward candidate H. Clinton, then promoted by Jake Sullivan her foreign policy advisor. Who gave us Syria and Libya policy during the Obama admin, and is the National Security Advisor for Biden.
I'm having a hard time finding the laws and processes you revere, Velo - help me out - ?