War in Ukraine

#17,001
#17,001
hog88 said:
It makes perfect sense. When the USSR crumbled Ukraine was in possession of state of the art labs, highly educated workers and they are not a NATO member so no treaties to worry about violating. Ukraine has also been plagued with a corrupt government since it's independence from the Soviet Union so it's a perfect place to set up shop.
Click to expand...
I think it would be harder to hide it in Ukraine than China. That’s all. Let me be clear I absolutely believe the US is using whatever proxies they need to in order to satisfy their bio weapon development thirst. I just don’t see Ukraine fitting an easily hide able case that’s all. And as far as developed bio labs available money solved that problem over night I’d guess.
 
#17,003
#17,003
evillawyer said:
Hey Siri, what is gaslighting?

Click to expand...



His audience doesn't seem to care. Its like they blocked out the first comment, entirely.

Couldn't believe it when I heard it the first time. But he said it, clear as day.

what-speechless.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128, Septic and MontyPython
#17,004
#17,004
Tucker often resorts to the "incredulous stare" argument when he doesn't have a real counter.

lawgator1 said:
His audience doesn't seem to care. Its like they blocked out the first comment, entirely.

Couldn't believe it when I heard it the first time. But he said it, clear as day.

what-speechless.gif
Click to expand...
 
#17,005
#17,005
lawgator1 said:
His audience doesn't seem to care. Its like they blocked out the first comment, entirely.

Couldn't believe it when I heard it the first time. But he said it, clear as day.

what-speechless.gif
Click to expand...
Weird that you all care so much. I’ve never watched him so don’t know why liberals care so much about tv personalities they don’t agree with and know all about their shows. Just like the latest Twitter and tik tok trend of liberals showing full sermons from Greg Locke. Literally no one outside his cult cares and libs are obsessed with him
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, InVOLuntary and davethevol
#17,006
#17,006
Rickyvol77 said:
Weird that you all care so much. I’ve never watched him so don’t know why liberals care so much about tv personalities they don’t agree with and know all about their shows. Just like the latest Twitter and tik tok trend of liberals showing full sermons from Greg Locke. Literally no one outside his cult cares and libs are obsessed with him
Click to expand...

Agreed, Tucker is a loud mouth like 90% of the other idiots on TV who just try to shock with their opinions to get more views.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HammondB3Vol, AM64, EasternVol and 2 others
#17,007
#17,007
utvolpj said:
You're not reading what I'm posting. They have been marginalized and purged from caucuses, party, etc. If you're unaware then maybe you should look into it before making such bold claims

One big example would be actual conservatives
Click to expand...


Like it or not, The GOP is Trump's Party. After Trump, DeSantis likely inherits the torch. McConnell, Romney, Graham, Cheney, Kinzinger, etc types are relics of the old GOP order. The new GOP order will be MAGA/America First type candidates.
 
#17,009
#17,009
volgr said:
Like it or not, The GOP is Trump's Party. After Trump, DeSantis likely inherits the torch. McConnell, Romney, Graham, Cheney, Kinzinger, etc types are relics of the old GOP order. The new GOP order will be MAGA/America First type candidates.
Click to expand...

While we (as a country, screw the parties) don't need a DeSantis it is way past time for the the Republican party to rid themselves of the types you mentioned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, TrumpedUpVol and McDad
#17,014
#17,014
volgr said:
Like it or not, The GOP is Trump's Party. After Trump, DeSantis likely inherits the torch. McConnell, Romney, Graham, Cheney, Kinzinger, etc types are relics of the old GOP order. The new GOP order will be MAGA/America First type candidates.
Click to expand...
Hopefully they'll finally stop referring to themselves as conservatives
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, McDad and MG1968
#17,015
#17,015
LouderVol said:
To be fair that's probably the Russian 14.5 dishka. A little bigger than our 50s/12.7
Click to expand...

Side note, but I found it interesting the Soviets/Russians have gone through three iterations of their .50 system since adopting it while our almost 90 year old M2 is still the gold standard when it comes to heavy machine guns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, NorthDallas40 and hog88
#17,017
#17,017
volgr said:
How do you define Conservative? "Conservatives" have failed to really conserve anything the last 30 years.
Click to expand...
The definition hasn't really changed yet they kept the name. That's the point. Have some pride and come out for what they really stand for
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
#17,018
#17,018
utvolpj said:
The definition hasn't really changed yet they kept the name. That's the point. Have some pride and come out for what they really stand for
Click to expand...

What is your definition? Which politician would you say is closest to matching your definition of Conservtive?
 
#17,019
#17,019
volgr said:
How do you define Conservative? "Conservatives" have failed to really conserve anything the last 30 years.
Click to expand...

The few conservatives that are elected either fail to get reelected or get sucked into the corruption and become what they campaigned against. It's hard to stay in office telling your constituents they can't have free ****.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, RavinDave, Rasputin_Vol and 3 others
#17,020
#17,020
volgr said:
Like it or not, The GOP is Trump's Party. After Trump, DeSantis likely inherits the torch. McConnell, Romney, Graham, Cheney, Kinzinger, etc types are relics of the old GOP order. The new GOP order will be MAGA/America First type candidates.
Click to expand...
The problem is we still have a small portion of people who want this old GOP order back. It's not happening. I think some have realized it so they have latched on to the democrat party and mainstream media outlets. I refer to them as Bush Republicans.
That's where one switch has occurred. Many of the Bush Republicans have hopped onto the democrat party while many working class democrats have switched to the Republican Party under Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol
#17,021
#17,021
DonjoVol said:
The problem is we still have a small portion of people who want this old GOP order back. It's not happening. I think some have realized it so they have latched on to the democrat party and mainstream media outlets. I refer to them as Bush Republicans.
That's where one switch has occurred. Many of the Bush Republicans have hopped onto the democrat party while many working class democrats have switched to the Republican Party under Trump.
Click to expand...
If Ron Paul had gotten the support Trump did, we could have had a real conservative/classical liberal in the White House. Instead we got a populist dog whistler who said conservative things while signing every spending bill sent to his desk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RavinDave, Rasputin_Vol, McDad and 1 other person
#17,024
#17,024
MG1968 said:
If Ron Paul had gotten the support Trump did, we could have had a real conservative/classical liberal in the White House. Instead we got a populist dog whistler who said conservative things while signing every spending bill sent to his desk.
Click to expand...

The 17th amendment has allowed the people to vote themselves largesse from the treasury, no conservative/classical liberal can be elected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, Rasputin_Vol, volfanhill and 2 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top