volgr
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
- Messages
- 7,921
- Likes
- 8,185
You’ll pay more if people like Putin grab more land and resources.
You actually need to be able to prioritize what is just, noble, needed. It is required in personal finances or running a business.
This doesn’t bother me. But hopefully PJ is consistent and posts that issue in every thread where any federal dollars are spent.
The learned and adapted is my take.
That is how you get yourself into trouble with the Russia haters
I would think a more reasonable assessment just based on those three takes would be the Russians "have adapted from early tactics that resulted in massive and crippling unforced errors and are now progressing forward slowly but surely against fierce resistance".
This conflict is beginning to look a lot like how the Russians went about taking Chechnya, in that first they went in to "liberate" and then when they were not welcomed, they deployed a brutal but thorough subjugation campaign. Not sure that strategy is going to work today in Ukraine, with pop size, large borders with the EU and social media being significant differentiating factors.
All military endeavors adapt to some degree, but you went many steps beyond that and stated Russia is progressing quickly citing contrary intelligence reports. I'm not seeing anything that indicates things are progressing very well for Russia. If anything it's a slow plodding advance. That isn't ideal for Russia or anyone else. The advances have bogged down and some are flat out stalling. While it's certainly not good for Ukraine this is about as bad as things could go for Russia short of getting beat. They do not appear to have overwhelming superiority on the battlefield.
Putin stated his goals years ago and has been doing this for a while. If Europe feels threatened they should step upPutin is making moves we haven’t seen in our lives. It isn’t hearsay or intelligence, it is him directly. We are talking money here, so no reason to drag in a “lives” argument.
You are consistent on your fiscal stance and I generally am in your boat. But I doubt you make that post in every thread. I would give high priority to the issue of a mad man in control of a nuclear arsenal. So this money is not a concern to me.
Your first sentence is using the common tactics of rationalization and justification. We all use those when we support a decision....ex: i need this new car which costs 65k to save money at the gas pump. Not surprisingly those who support spending on things you deem wasteful would the same tactics of rationalization and justification.
I wish we could prioritize what is worth public money. I am dubious we as a country will ever agree on what is worthy of our debt.
Putin stated his goals years ago and has been doing this for a while. If Europe feels threatened they should step up
This is a very close replica of how Iraq was sold. Turns out that was a govt lie funded by the mic. Hard to move hardware if there's no war to fight
I will stand by the idea that a mad man waging war and threatening nukes needs to be dealt with and is at the top of a priority list. How that money is best utilized isn’t something I can determine but I am certain it is a priority worthy of expenditures.
His rhetoric is very grim and imo reflects a fear of losing control. This war is disastrous for Ukraine and the Russian people both.What he has done the last month is beyond what most anyone would have predicted.
His rhetoric is not acceptable and puts him in a position where he does need to be handled.
Remember this day and this moment of resolve. When you see others support spending you deem unworthy, you will have an understanding of their feelings and how they approached their decision to support.
I do not support American involvement. I do not support sending them public money. It is Ukraine's war. It is Europe's war.
His rhetoric is very grim and imo reflects a fear of losing control. This war is disastrous for Ukraine and the Russian people both.
I have no problem remembering it or being fully confident the wasteful spending we do on illegitimate items dwarfs this.
There is a plan here. Smart people see it. It's a long term plan, an "after Putin" plan. Pricess will come down after this. That's why extremists have to attack now.
We had our part to play in this. we're no saints.It is, but none of it was our fault or our desire. As a world leader we must also be a leader of peace. I am very proud in the restraint we have shown. You and I both know we could step in and demolish Putin rn, but at what cost? As it stands, the worst case rn is one to three "catastrophes" bring let off, at worst case. The people of Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine are reminding us what Democracy and Humanity look like. Maybe we all needed that wake up call.
There is current wasteful spending which is insignificant to this wasteful spending to Ukraine. Is the wasteful spending with is far less than the Ukraine money not wasteful (to you) because it is far fewer dollars?
They have corrupted timeframes. Part of it is due to Russia not using heavy "shock and awe" bombing before they sent in ground troops. The other part of it is their narrative needs to be that Russia is being bogged down in a quagmire and it helps set the stage for them to run a false flag, then they can say that Putin got desperate and had a temper tantrum bio attack or chemical attack... or nuclear attack.They pretty much have Mauripol. They are continuing to close in on the Donbass. It's a slow squeeze. I guess it is relative to your expectations.
Same for me. The dollars are less important than the established ideal that we throw money at our problems.The cause would be more of the issue than the dollars. Again, containing a mad man that threatens nukes is high on my priority list. Having a department of education isn’t.
Same for me. The dollars are less important than the established ideal that we throw money at our problems.
I am sure you aren't surprised, I am for no public spending regardless of the issue. If people want to give as a charitable donation, of course, I support that.
You were pushing this conspiracy crap when you said the West was lying and Putin wasn’t going to invade tooThey have corrupted timeframes. Part of it is due to Russia not using heavy "shock and awe" bombing before they sent in ground troops. The other part of it is their narrative needs to be that Russia is being bogged down in a quagmire and it helps set the stage for them to run a false flag, then they can say that Putin got desperate and had a temper tantrum bio attack or chemical attack... or nuclear attack.
We had our part to play in this. we're no saints.
If we were to go in with anything other than a quick, and complete defeat of the Russian military, the rest of the world will slip our grasp and there will be wars all over the globe.