f77f00
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2010
- Messages
- 2,272
- Likes
- 604
6 teams in the SEC would have drilled ND last night....UT is not on the list.
Lou is suffering and confused by the beat down.
some of you guys are sipping the SEC stuff too much. ND is a good team that just got whooped. it's hard to deny the facts that ND has NFL talent on that roster. they have guys that are big fast and strong like Alabama but they are not as deep or seasoned.
Good teams get hammered sometimes in big games. 1995 Florida vs Nebraska or 1992 Miami vs Alabama. Denver vs San Fransisco in 1989. It happens but doesn't mean every scrub team in the nation is better than the team that lost.
the OP and others trying to make this argument are as dumb as a box of rocks. to even suggest that a 7 loss team is better than a 12-0 team is nuts. I'm no ND fan, but they beat about ten teams that went to bowl games this year. they blew out Oklahoma at Oklahoma. so they played a team that beat them at there own game, and you somehow try to relate them to Tennessee. just stupid.
Yes, we all agree that our defense was very disappointing, giving up so many busts and big gains.
But this thread asks, "Was Notre Dame much better than UT?"
ND was heralded as having one of the best D's in the nation, while our's was statistically in the bottom 20, I think.
Against common opponent Bama, ND held em to 529 yds and 42 pts, while we held em to 539 and 44 pts.
Was ND much better? :question:
That WAS the question. Some got it. Thanks.