LOL USC.
Good move by Petersen. Guy hates being in the spotlight so USC/Texas wouldn't work for him. This allows him to go to a school that's under the radar but has a solid foundation and is historically successful. What a hire by UW.
I don't see how Petersen is a gimmick;
92-12 with two BCS bowl victories and 7 10+ win seasons. Plus he has beaten teams such as Oklahoma, Oregon (x2), TCU, VT, and Georgia. If he is a gimmick by god I'd take that sort of production in Knoxville any day.
Heck yes. And at Boise St, no less.
David Shaw might be the only coach in the Pac12 on level with Peterson.
Case in point, Sanford. Jim Harbough was successful at San Diego, an FCS school before he was hired by Stanford. Very easy to bash that hire at the time. And he was certainly stepping into a conference with a lot of teams better than the one he was coaching.
The bottom line is Peterson is a great coach with proven performance. He will succeed at UW.
You'd take my coach in a heart beat and promptly "bUTchslap" your current guy out the door without even packing his bags or painting a rock.
To University of Washington.............. good for SEC or was he scared of the SEC? He could've had any job he wanted a few years ago. Thoughts?
Peterson steps in to a conference where Stanford, Oregon, ASU, UCLA, and SC are all better. He's never faced a conference in which he's had more than one legit contender for the conference championship.
Then take a look at his own division leaders, Stanford and Oregon. When you think of the PAC12 currently, which two schools could you blindly name the potential conference favorite?
Now consider the demand for OOC scheduling. What program "on par" with Washington currently can they agree to a home and home with that they dont risk utter humiliation?
It doesn't rain nearly as much as you'd think. Knoxville gets about 10 inches more rain per year. It's just often gray and drizzly in the wintertime. Summers are great.