i've seen no evidence of christians being any more moral than anyone else. quite the opposite in my life.
Further, Barna provided numbers showing how substantially different evangelicals are from the rest of society. "They are by far the most active in evangelism, most likely to read the Bible, to pray, to attend church services, to volunteer at a church, and to engage in a small group during the week, and give away almost three times as much money as do other Americans. They are several times more likely to possess a Biblical worldview as are others, are the only people group among whom a majority consider their faith to be their top priority in life, are more involved in alternative models of church than anyone else, are the most concerned about how their children are raised, and are also the most well-informed among Christians regarding the interaction between their faith in Christ and current public issues."
With all the changes in life since "B.C." and the disagreement among the masses on the interpretation/meaning of the Bible, I wonder why "God" hasn't seen the need to give man direction as to his will since that time. If you believe the Bible, he saw that need before and acted on it. Why not since then?
Agree to disagree I suppose. I believe that "not under bondage" specifically addresses the bond of marriage.
Food for thought,
1st marriage is an institution of God and not to be taken lightly. Alot of people go into marriage half heartedly as long as "love" lasts. Marriage is intended to be a committment to each other, a love for each other, "as Christ loved the Church." God gave very few ways out biblically becacuse he knew the hearts of men. It is hard to move past adultery. Some can, some can't. Two beleivers however should commit every effort to salvage a marriage as they accepted that bond under God.
Here's another. Situation a long time ago growing up. Couple came to church to visit. My religion is conservative. Our only manuscript is the bible. My dad was an elder at the time, and was in disagreement with the edler's that counseled this family. Anyway, they were both divorced and re-married, and had kids together. Non-christians but searching. They were told by a couple of "blind" elders that they would half to return to their original spouses in order to have salvation because neither marriage ended as a result of adultery. Thoughts?
Here's mine. The Bible teaches that God accepts us as we are. If we are in a sinful situation and then put on Christ our past sins our forgiven and we have grace for our sins yet committed. In this case, I would argue that if they had been guided correctly, and became saved, then they are at that point and forward in God, thus bringing righteousness to their marriage. Yet these 2 elders spoke of creating a second divorce for unscriptural reasons to rectify the first divorce. If a couple is not in God, and are looking for God, how can you tell them they have to divorce again and go back in order to be saved. There is only one unforgiveable sin. People cannot become righteous before they accept God. The blood of Christ is what makes you righteous from that day forward. The point is to put on Christ, "go forth and sin no more."
I will give you another situation of religious silliness.
My dad was an elder in the church for 10 years. My mom died of cancer. One month later, two of the three other elders called a meeting and asked my dad to step down. The reason.......you guessed it.......he was no longer "the husband of one wife".
Humans screw up religion all the time. That is never an excuse for not beleiving.
but you can live like a saint for your entire life and just happen to not believe in jesus and rot in hell for all eternity. seem fair.
Bingo. It's easy to look to a Christian to find a reason to doubt Christianity. We are flawed and stumble. But this is why we are supposed to look to Christ as the role model and not man. A non-Christian says "see the hypocrites? This is why I doubt that faith." Fortunately for us the standard is not to be completely perfect. We strive but until we leave the flesh we stumble.
You are operating on the false assumption that anyone does or ever could achieve the level of personal righteousness that would entitle them to heaven.
Only a sinless man could stake claim that he deserved heaven rather than God's wrath... yet the only sinless man voluntarily endured the full weight of God's wrath to pay the price for those willing to believe.
I know this is going to get heavily religious, so I put it here. No, I do not intend this as a "trap" thread. I welcome all belief perspectives.
I'm just curious: to you, what are legitimate reasons for divorce? What are not?
Don't worry folks, I'm as single as a loaf of bread's back heel. I just want to have a discussion about this.
I've been about as sinless as any man on earth in my life and I refuse to believe if the christian god exists that he would cast me into hell for not believing in him before meeting him. A truly loving god isn't that much of a douchebag.
Standard: cheating, lying, stealing etc. I don't believe not believing in god is a sin.
I've been about as sinless as any man on earth in my life and I refuse to believe if the christian god exists that he would cast me into hell for not believing in him before meeting him. A truly loving god isn't that much of a douchebag.