rockytopper522
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2009
- Messages
- 553
- Likes
- 1
Is this really necessary? How long before we've beaten this horse into dust?
Dooley recruited most of the talent that takes the field now. Yes. He left big holes. Yes the team is critically thin in places. He quit on his last recruiting class long before he was fired and that's probably the BIGGEST problem right now.
He didn't cause Gordon to quit.... who would have been a pretty nice guy to have around on this team at nickel. He didn't cause Bray, Hunter, or CP to go pro early. The latter two especially would be pretty valuable right now. He didn't cause DR to get stupid... at least not directly.
What did he do? He came in with enthusiasm. He had a decent first year with both play and recruiting. He got overwhelmed by the situation. He lost control of guys like Bray. He lost hope. He became negative. He became ineffective. He became bitter. He stopped working and withdrew into a shell... then he got fired.
Is this really something we have to relive in a new thread every week? He's gone. His career as far as being a HC is all but certainly over.... and he could have made more money as a lawyer as an assistant coach.
At some point, you need to let go of the contempt and just pity the guy for failing... unless of course you really do believe he did it on purpose. In that case... you need some help.
Wait for what? Hunter and CP (Dooley's receivers) are doing perfectly fine so far in the NFL (can add M Rivera to that list as well). Dooley can be criticized for a lot of things but coaching offense and recruiting good receivers is the last thing you can criticize him for (unlike the new staff which does not have a clue on how to use offensive talent they inherited - our o-line was not recruited for spread). And if you can remember 2 years ago Dooley's receivers Hunter and D Rogers thrashed CBJ and our current best in America staff.
You saw the thread title, if you don't want to discuss it....
I certainly don't need anyone telling me what is appropriate for me to discuss or not to discuss on a message board. I think it is a little silly really.
Rehashing arguments and reviewing the past is probably 30% of the content of this board, and that is a conservative estimate.
Also...you are underestimating the damage that Dooley did on the recruiting trail.
This right here in the last paragraph.
Part of the reason that Butch is being so widely praised is that his recruiting is a 180 from Dooley.
Dooley should be tarred and feathered for derelection of duty in his recruiting last season. I don't care how bad it got...the man didn't even attend a single high school game last season .
I know it probably is sacrilegious to disagree with some of you, but I don't think we blame Dooley for the lack of depth. Kiffin's class only had a few players left to finish their careers here. Then Dooley got about 45 days to scrap together a recruiting class his first year. Dools did some good things and some bad things. He was not ready to become head coach at an SEC program. His arrogance hurt him.
I can't blame him for that. I haven't been to one since I graduated from high school, 45 years ago.This right here in the last paragraph.
Part of the reason that Butch is being so widely praised is that his recruiting is a 180 from Dooley.
Dooley should be tarred and feathered for derelection of duty in his recruiting last season. I don't care how bad it got...the man didn't even attend a single high school game last season .
Oklahoma, USC, and LSU have all gone through it in the last quarter century. LSU had 6 straight losing seasons from 89-94, including a 2-9 season.So you want to blame Kiffin for lack of depth but not Dooley? I'm not really following you there. Dooley had plenty of time to make up for Kiffin.
You know people keep saying that we are in a cycle that every major program goes through, but I'm not so sure of that anymore. When did Alabama, Florida & Georgia have three straight losing seasons (I don't count South Carolina because they are a historically awful program)? The most recent example is Georgia, but that happened 50 years ago.
Oklahoma, USC, and LSU have all gone through it in the last quarter century. LSU had 6 straight losing seasons from 89-94, including a 2-9 season.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
It certainly wasn't coach or recruit for needs.
It's been bothering me more on Georgia week. He wasn't a organizational manager. He wasn't a player's coach. He wasn't a football coach. Everyone says we have no talent and no depth. What did he do here?
If Kiffin was an atom bomb leaving radioactive decay in his wake, the Bamboo Farmer was the process of erosion. It doesnt look like it's doing much then one day, poof, the mountain is gone.
Forget Steve Spurrier. I think Vol fans have to strongly consider Vince and Barbara as the ultimate Vol Nemeses of the modern era.
Go Vols!
Also, does it make that much difference if record is 5-7 or 7-5? In both cases program is not relevant (in NC as well as SEC race). Those all feel like lost years. If you accept that line of thinking the list is much longer (Nebraska, Auburn, Notre Dame, Michigan, Miami, FSU, all had fairly significant stretches of not being relevant).
I think it was over for him when Wilcox and Sirmon left. That ws a lot of the recruiting muscle on the team. I would like to know from them exactly why they left. I bet it would be enlightening.