OrngeJuiceJones
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2006
- Messages
- 29,595
- Likes
- 33,364
Maybe. But typically that type of leniency is for big time star players. I like Vescovi, but I don't think his name will come up in the committee's discussions.Our situation is so unique I doubt there any precedent but adding SV is essentially like getting a hurt player back. Add James to that as well
100 percent they will.. cause they kinda have to. They won’t consider any games with him regardless of W/L. He didn’t have a single impact in league play if I can rememberI wonder if the ncaa committee would take into consideration any of our roster changes because of Turner being out 20 games, and how our roster has changed? Maybe give us some credit there.
Honestly what really needs to happen is... and I really hate to say this.. is that KY or AU have to win the SECT. We don’t need any other team besides ourselves snatching a SECT automatic bid. There’s always something to be said about winning against the tournament champion and/or the regular season champs. Obviously we still need to beat AU
LSU and FL will shrink the conference spots if 1 of those teams win. We can’t afford to have huge gaps. The tourney is all about placements. They both are predicted for 6-9 seeds. We don’t need 1 of those teams to move to the 2-3 line because they win the SEC T. ...LSU and FL can win it too since they're in, right?
I still think beat AU and win two and we're in. Winning the SECT outright with our starters playing 35+ minutes is asking too much imo.
LSU and FL will shrink the conference spots if 1 of those teams win. We can’t afford to have huge gaps. The tourney is all about placements. They both are predicted for 6-9 seeds. We don’t need 1 of those teams to move to the 2-3 line because they win the SEC T. ...
A spot for what? The big dance? If SC gets in , then TN gets in (if TN beats AU Saturday) . If FL gets in, TN gets in. The only “split” choices will be SC or FL. Both teams won’t get in together IMO
WTH are you talking about ?
there is zero shot florida or LSU can move to the 2-3 line and even if they did that doesn’t matter to us
I really have a problem understanding Arkansas and South Carolina being talked ahead of UT in the bubble watch. Kind of strange to me.
I agree that the timing is at the end, but I always thought that playing better toward the end was more important than playing crappy at the end. If we beat Auburn, and that’s a large if, no one else has knocked off Florida, Auburn, and Florida. It kind of baffles me.I think it has to do with the fact that your run is so recent. Up until beating UF and then Ky, meh, middle of the pack. Its only because of the sudden success against one good and one okay team that its is becoming an issue. Just timing.