Wow. Someone who agrees with Ras. We did attack japan first by not selling them fuel to fund their war effort.Have you ever stopped to think about the strategic implications when you talk about industries that are "relics of our economic past"? Those things make us hostage to other countries. Car manufacturing in the US is currently shutting down due to computer chip shortages. This is supposedly at least covid related, but the point remains it could be economic hostage taking or an act of war when you allow vital industries supplying necessary materials to be moved out of the country. If there is a WW3, we might not lose on the battlefield - we might lose by not even making it to the battlefield.
We should have never been in the middle east either. Somebody did sum ting and we went balls to the wall once again to kill people. Eff the rest of the world, it's time we just live our own life and forget about everyone else.We should have never been in Vietnam and we should have stopped at Pyongyang in 1950.
Siap. I agree with the caveat not on "basic" foods. Fruits, veggies, bread, meat.Keeping with this income tax theme. I would also be in favor of just doing away with it completely and just having a national sales tax. 10% on all purchases.
No might about it. Much of our war machine is built overseas.Have you ever stopped to think about the strategic implications when you talk about industries that are "relics of our economic past"? Those things make us hostage to other countries. Car manufacturing in the US is currently shutting down due to computer chip shortages. This is supposedly at least covid related, but the point remains it could be economic hostage taking or an act of war when you allow vital industries supplying necessary materials to be moved out of the country. If there is a WW3, we might not lose on the battlefield - we might lose by not even making it to the battlefield.
I doubt that's something congress would ever look into anyways.
Read the Mandables by Lionel Shriver. It tracks along on what's going to happen.
I understand the implications of no longer having an industrial economy, but as I mentioned it’s a natural progression of capitalistic economies.
As far as the war analogy, we would be in trouble in a protracted war situation (at least initially), but does anyone really believe that a modern war scenario would end up being drawn-out, multi-year engagements like the wars of the 20th century? I have my doubts. Plus, as much as we’ve spent on defense in the last 20-30 years, we better have stockpiles for any given scenario... if not, we get what we deserve.
We've spent a lot of money on extremely expensive weapons system that do wear out, break, and with battle losses lose the necessary critical mass to sustain the attack. Cost for weapons systems doesn't necessarily equal staying power. In the last century we generally were prepared for a different war than the one we fought, so we had the wrong weapons and sort of made do with them, and it frequently didn't work. When we've had the ability to use weapons effectively (particularly airpower), congress has hamstrung their use with rules of engagement. If you don't have the ability to add by adapting to need, rebuild, and sustain the flow of expendables such as munitions, you are a dead duck.
If you believe that leaving an industrial economy behind is the natural progression, then I'll tell you it's a natural progression to failure.