Losing big to SC is apparently a deal breaker for Bama fans, but they think they should jump TCU who lost in OT in a bogus game yet was +2 games better than them lolz"-UGA, MICH., TCU, OSU is complete BS. Bama lost two games by 1 play and almost lost 2 more games by 1 play "
.
UGA zero losses
MICH zero losses
OSU one loss
TCU one loss
Bama two losses. 1 < 2
.
This does beg the question after watching three of these teams having muffin schedules. If we aren’t giving a sh!t about strength of schedule anymore then why not load our ooc schedule with easy wins. Seems to work for them. We are going to have to go through bama and Georgia and lsu all in conference. This already pretty much guarantees unless we play lights out we will not have another opportunity like the one we threw away this year.
This does beg the question after watching three of these teams having muffin schedules. If we aren’t giving a sh!t about strength of schedule anymore then why not load our ooc schedule with easy wins. Seems to work for them. We are going to have to go through bama and Georgia and lsu all in conference. This already pretty much guarantees unless we play lights out we will not have another opportunity like the one we threw away this year.
Comparison to other SEC team’s schedules, it does usually seem like there was crack cocaine involved in making UTs schedules, especially since 2000 plus… Why make it so freaking hard? I think that was the formula in 98.. but like a lot of other things, that is no longer the caseThis does beg the question after watching three of these teams having muffin schedules. If we aren’t giving a sh!t about strength of schedule anymore then why not load our ooc schedule with easy wins. Seems to work for them. We are going to have to go through bama and Georgia and lsu all in conference. This already pretty much guarantees unless we play lights out we will not have another opportunity like the one we threw away this year.
TCU didn’t fall because their resume is better than Ohio St and Alabama, in addition to their only loss coming by 3 points in OT to a top 10 team in the conference championship. It’s a little different than losing a regular season game.I realize this is to celebrate the whining of the Bama fans - but some of those comments are spot on.
Show me a team that did not fall at least 1 spot when it lost.
Now TCU may surprise folks and be competitive - but if the following happens:
- UM destroys TCU OR it is close game, UM wins and then number 3 happens
- UGA destroys OSU
- UGA destroys UM
We will be back to - these were not the 4 best teams. One of those three need to either win or play UGA closer than TN did - otherwise it will be true that the selection committee did not pick the best four teams.
This does beg the question after watching three of these teams having muffin schedules. If we aren’t giving a sh!t about strength of schedule anymore then why not load our ooc schedule with easy wins. Seems to work for them. We are going to have to go through bama and Georgia and lsu all in conference. This already pretty much guarantees unless we play lights out we will not have another opportunity like the one we threw away this year.
Most teams will go to an easy out of conference schedule since it will be extremely difficult with a 9 game schedule in the SEC.If we go to a 9 game schedule which is likely based on Sankey's comments, we should never schedule a FBS team in a P5 conference again.... Especially if we ditch divisions....
TCU didn’t fall because their resume is better than Ohio St and Alabama, in addition to their only loss coming by 3 points in OT to a top 10 team in the conference championship. It’s a little different than losing a regular season game.
Losing big to SC is apparently a deal breaker for Bama fans, but they think they should jump TCU who lost in OT in a bogus game yet was +2 games better than them lolz