T_Vol376
Marked on VolNation
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2015
- Messages
- 2,208
- Likes
- 4,531
I believe so, as mlindsay said... that's if she stays in the SEC correct? If she does not she doesn't sit a year. Is that right, mlindsay?
Do you think that practicing she realized her playing time might behind the freshmen??
I think she sits out a year regardless but the NCAA grants family hardships in the case of like an immediately relative has an illness so something like that. So for example if she had a parent or sibling diagnosed with something and she needed to be closer to home to help, she could be granted immediate eligibility to play. I thought she would transfer last summer so to see her sit out a year (and waste a redshirt) to then transfer is baffling to me, I wish her the best though.
As far as I'm concerned, these two transfers are yet another indictment of Warlick. Whatever the reason for a transfer, it almost always has something to do with the coach and coaching decisions/personality. Even if there is some class between player personalities, it is the coach's job to sort it out and keep the group together. More cracks in the program. And the timing couldn't be worse. The Vols just had another bad season, were looking at have a formidable team this year with Cooper back and the freshmen coming in --and now we've lost two guards and the Vols, have NO experienced point guard and are back to having depth issues. Something is rotten in Denmark.
As far as I'm concerned, these two transfers are yet another indictment of Warlick. Whatever the reason for a transfer, it almost always has something to do with the coach and coaching decisions/personality. Even if there is some class between player personalities, it is the coach's job to sort it out and keep the group together. More cracks in the program. And the timing couldn't be worse. The Vols just had another bad season, were looking at have a formidable team this year with Cooper back and the freshmen coming in --and now we've lost two guards and the Vols, have NO experienced point guard and are back to having depth issues. Something is rotten in Denmark.
Yet Diamond stayed when she could have been a number 1 WNBA pick.
But if you want to agree with people saying Alexa is less of a Lady Vols because she decided to finish her eligibility elsewhere, then be my guest.
Up to this point, you have claimed that Cooper is a subpar player with a bad jump shot who would have made little difference to the program's fortunes this season. Now her transfer is a devastating lass.
And I do agree that losing Cooper is a blow. I think, given her rehab had gone well, she would have been a key player. But transfers happen in all programs, whether it be Baylor, Uconn, Maryland or the LVs under Summitt. So, it is a stretch that transfers are unique indictment of Holly.
But given your MO, of course you seize this bad news as another opportunity to declare that HOLLY SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN GIVEN THE JOB AND SHE IS THE WORST COACH EVER.
I am glad you re-asserted the point because this time I really, really, really understand how you feel.
that Cooper was a "sub-par" player. I said she was a player who struggled against zone defenses as a freshman and did not shoot the ball very well. Both true. I said she was a talented player who is best suited to play uptempo and against man-to-man defenses--also obviously true. Regardless of my opinion, she certainly seemed destined to play a big role on the team his year--and was our only point guard with experience. To lose two guards with experience is a major blow. We are now back to having depth issues. It is fair to say that transfers are somewhat common and perhaps unavoidable in some cases. One can also argue, as I will, that they are a reflection of the coach and the program. It is the coaches job to manage the players. That is not easy to do, in some cases, and there are suggestions that Cooper has attitude issues. Maybe her leaving was unavoidable. But the bottom line is that a struggling program, desperate to put a foot right for a change, has just been hit by more bad news.
In another post on the Cooper thread, you said this program has "a bad mojo" and Ithink it is fair to assume to attribute that to Holly. But is not also possible that your interpretation of what constitutes a bad mojo is a bit selective. Is there not a bit of good mojo that two likely first round draft picks and AA candidates opted to come back for their remaining years of eligibility? Next year, we have a bonafide big three and two highly touted PGs coming into the team fold. Is that not some positive mojo?
In another post on the Cooper thread, you said this program has "a bad mojo" and Ithink it is fair to assume to attribute that to Holly. But is not also possible that your interpretation of what constitutes a bad mojo is a bit selective. Is there not a bit of good mojo that two likely first round draft picks and AA candidates opted to come back for their remaining years of eligibility? Next year, we have a bonafide big three and two highly touted PGs coming into the team fold. Is that not some positive mojo?