orangetanker11
Change is coming
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2007
- Messages
- 2,000
- Likes
- 1
It is. You're presumably asking who is the best at drawing up little X's and O's on chalkboards and diagramming plays, which would be meaningful if that were a useful disembodied skill independent of the players involved. The problem is that the Xs and Os represent wildly varying players of vastly different skill levels, and selecting and recruiting those players is at least as important as what you do with them once you've got them. You could match the world chess champion against some random eighth-grader, and if the eighth grader has five queens then the champion's going to lose every time. Asking who the "best coach" is while ignoring roster-building is a meaningless question.
What?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
That is ignorant.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
What else is new.
This is beyond ignorant. BUT...it is only par for the course for you, I suppose.
Do you know how horrible your decision making has to be to actually drive drunk? We are talking about a 50 year old man here. What gives?
How far will you guys go to defend bob huggins? haha
I wonder what you would say if it came out that he was a kiddie diddler? That's A.O.K too?
Yes, any grown man that gets a DUI in today's police society has some serious issues, and is most likely a drunk.
How long is it going to take you to realize that these two things aren't the same. I said one of them, one you're imagining me saying.