The difference between these "racist idiots" and "racist idiots " like Sharpton and Farrakhan, etc. is what? Well, these guys are young, probably drunk, and trying to act in an outrageous way around their friends like young males often do, and they thought that they were doing it in private.
Sharpton, etc, are adults who make a living intentionally being racists. What consequences do they suffer?
It's unfortunate that Sharpton, Jackson, Farrakhan, et al suffer no consequences for their actions.
But are you suggesting that because SOME racist idiots have suffered no consequences, ALL racist idiots should get free passes? Do you think that ALL muderers should get a free pass because OJ Simpson wasn't convicted?
As long as they're interested in making themselves radioactive to all potential employers, suing for your right to be a racist idiot is a swell idea.
You think it's irrelevant. But rational, thoughtful people realize that not all college stupidity is created equal.
O.J. was innocent. Football stars don't commit crimes. They are beyond reproach, especially if they are on your team.It's unfortunate that Sharpton, Jackson, Farrakhan, et al suffer no consequences for their actions.
But are you suggesting that because SOME racist idiots have suffered no consequences, ALL racist idiots should get free passes? Do you think that ALL muderers should get a free pass because OJ Simpson wasn't convicted?
The faculty is employed by whom? Their checks are paid by whom? They are being kicked out of school because they said something that people didn't like.
Well it only took a day. Two people expelled from a public university without due process for saying the n-word. I'd say that qualifies as a 1st amendment violation or at least that's the way I remember it when I was sitting in Con Law as a 1L with all the other racist frat rats.
You could fill up a bus with U.T. football players accused of sexual assaults in Knoxville.Not really a good analogy; you're talking about an individual act compared to a bus full of people.
A better comparison would probably be what Duke lacrosse was accused of, and they basically did disband the team even though the accusations had zero substance.
You think it's irrelevant. But rational, thoughtful people realize that not all college stupidity is created equal.
If you work for the State of Tennessee, and you get filmed saying something horribly racist while away from the office, the State absolutely has the right to fire you.
The First Amendment only protects you from being sent to prison, fined, executed, or deported for exercising your right to free speech. It does not guarantee you college admission or employment.
Only morons twist it that way. It's suing for your right to do what you want in privacy without a gov't institution interfering in that. And if they're punishing them for it, they're interfering with their rights to do so.
If you work for the State of Tennessee the state signs your paycheck. Students aren't on payroll.If you work for the State of Tennessee, and you get filmed saying something horribly racist while away from the office, the State absolutely has the right to fire you.
The First Amendment only protects you from being sent to prison, fined, executed, or deported for exercising your right to free speech. It does not guarantee you college admission or employment.
OU is not interfering in their right to say what they want, when they want. OU is saying "If you choose to do this, we will not associate with you." The right to associate with who you choose is also protected.
So, it is okay in your opinion for the fraternity to exclude blacks, if the members don't want to associate with them?OU is not interfering in their right to say what they want, when they want. OU is saying "If you choose to do this, we will not associate with you." The right to associate with who you choose is also protected.