rjd970
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2007
- Messages
- 24,298
- Likes
- 24,322
I'm not arguing that the NT says anything about violence against non believers. I'm arguing that the crusades were an example of violent religious extremism, just as today's extreme muslims are.
My point exactly... why are you trying to compare something that happened ~ 1,000 years ago with modern day beliefs? There were many (or even most) cultures 1,000 years ago that pillaged and destroyed villages to increase their wealth and expand their reach.
The relevant question is how many other cultures and/or religions (besides Muslim) believe this should be done today?
Feds say militia members wanted to attack cops - Security- msnbc.com
Christian Extremists arrested for ploting to kill police officers.
It goes both ways. Idiots are on both sides
Apples to oranges? They're both examples of religious extremism, no matter when they happened.
Nations, not religious sects, did that 1,000 years ago to expand reach and wealth. But I digress.
Since you're against religious violence in the present, might I also assume you're against religious violence that occurred in the past?
Nations, not religious sects, did that 1,000 years ago to expand reach and wealth. But I digress.
Since you're against religious violence in the present, might I also assume you're against religious violence that occurred in the past?
Feds say militia members wanted to attack cops - Security- msnbc.com
Christian Extremists arrested for ploting to kill police officers.
It goes both ways. Idiots are on both sides
He can't without mentioning some other school of thought besides atheism (communism, social darwinism, etc). It isn't possible to believe in killing for the sake of not believing. It's oxymoronic.
What does this matter? Augustine and Aquinas believed in the torture and execution of heretics. Are we to assume they never read the Sermon on the Mount?
I'm not arguing that the NT says anything about violence against non believers. I'm arguing that the crusades were an example of violent religious extremism, just as today's extreme muslims are.
There have been very few, if any, wars fought for religion alone. Religion may have played a part but other reasons such as economic resources, land, played just as much of a role, if not more so, than religion.
Feds say militia members wanted to attack cops - Security- msnbc.com
Christian Extremists arrested for ploting to kill police officers.
It goes both ways. Idiots are on both sides
The old testament certainly did. But I agree that the NT is not the same animal.
but I've been told here that Christians who do it are on the fringe (and not true believers) while it's a requirement in other religions. How could this happen to the religion of peace and tolerance?
nice fix. The irony of one religion making fun of another is amazing
However the facts need to be laid out on the table correctly. Because it just seems that people are demonizing Christianity and glorifying islam,