emainvol
Giver of Sexy
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2006
- Messages
- 22,538
- Likes
- 20
it's not simple minded, it's morals. some people don't want homosexuality promoted or want children to be forced to embrace. trying to compare homosexuality with interracial relationships is truly an ignorant comparison. it's two completely different things. i agree that people are against interracial relationships but it isn't immoral. a homo relationship is.
i know it horrible to mention the M word in todays world, but it's true. it would be no different than some dude wanting to marry 3 or 4 16yr olds.
i do, i don't think they should serve openly. the military isn't civilian life. they have a lot of rules that civilians don't have. if they allow this, i think you'll see a lot guys get out and you'll see a lot of dudes getting their gay butts beat. (and not in a fun gay way either)
No. An ignorant comparison is you equating homosexuality and pedophilia.
As for your morals, you must be a miserable person. Caught between hate and forgiving.
When you climb out of your cave and turn down your toby keith records for a second think about this. If you were in the army in a battle and some dude next to you took a bullet that was meant for you, would you give a crap whether he was gay or not? I certainly wouldn't
I wouldn't imagine being gay would make a guy less accurate with a rifle!
I hate it when consenting adults do things different than me too!what i was saying that homosexuality is as wrong as religious people wanting to marry 3 wives at once and it wouldn't matter if they were 16yr old or 30 yr old.
as for me being miserable, not at all. i'm not a liberal, i don't hate anyone. especially my country.
what i was saying that homosexuality is as wrong as religious people wanting to marry 3 wives at once and it wouldn't matter if they were 16yr old or 30 yr old.
as for me being miserable, not at all. i'm not a liberal, i don't hate anyone. especially my country.
and anyone can pose for a picture. not sure what the point of that pic was.
I don't know, but here's a picture of him striking a Heisman pose with a baby. This isn't consequential to the "gay" or "not gay" argument, but it is a pretty awesome picture.
Makes you wonder if he was A) handed the baby for a picture and randomly struck the pose, B) was handed the baby for this pose or C) just randomly absconded with a baby and posed.
Makes you think...