2025 Seed Watch Party Thread

#527
#527
I guess the committee this year HAS to take into account the full SEC tournament.

Because if for instance, whoever wins it doesn’t get the 1 seed, it’d be a PR nightmare for the committee.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vol94
#528
#528
Stoerner Fumbles said:
I also hope there are no poisonous spiders in our uniforms. That would be bad.
Click to expand...

I mean, which coach is responsible for checking this? Surely Barnes knows that poisonous spiders in the uni is bad. Huge fail on our staff to overlook this.
 
#536
#536
The bad news is today’s game dropped us from 1st to 3rd in defensive efficiency. The good news is it also improved our offensive efficiency from 25th to 18th. Thats a massive jump from one game this late in the year. Final 4 here we come!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Willy14, tev.sm and MinisterofDef#92
#537
#537
The Louisville win last night guaranteed we will have to face possibly Gonzaga or Kansas in the 2nd round. We better somehow figue out Hunter Dickinson
 
#538
#538
ABtheVolsfan92 said:
The Louisville win last night guaranteed we will have to face possibly Gonzaga or Kansas in the 2nd round. We better somehow figue out Hunter Dickinson
Click to expand...
You’ve become the Andy Kauffman of the basketball forum. It’s either the saddest honest portrayal of a doomed fan, or the most brilliant piece of performance digital troll art of all time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: matt1107, MinisterofDef#92, Lankykong and 1 other person
#539
#539
Lunardi has changed his tune (again). “Whoever advances the farthest” gets the final 1-seed was fiction. Turns out he meant to add “whoever advances the farthest between Florida and Alabama”. So us winning today would mean basically nothing.

 
  • Like
Reactions: MinisterofDef#92 and Johnnyreb#VFL
#541
#541
TheMookieMonster said:
Lunardi has changed his tune (again). “Whoever advances the farthest” gets the final 1-seed was fiction. Turns out he meant to add “whoever advances the farthest between Florida and Alabama”. So us winning today would mean basically nothing.

Click to expand...

Two takes here, either don’t buy any of this as fact, such as “Indiana has been re-evaluated” like they weren’t being evaluated before today. OR, that was a slip of the tongue (pen) and he’s repeating something a committee member told him.
 
#542
#542
I’ve decided I don’t care about a 1 seed anymore. All the ifs buts just make me mad. I do however still want to beat auburn.
 
#547
#547
Yeiser10 said:
I don’t care what that stupid Lunardi says, we win tomorrow we deserve the 1
Click to expand...
I don't for a second believe they'll actually give it to us based on how they've treated conference tourney games in the past. But IF we win tomorrow, that would give us a 2-1 record against FL OR a 2-0 record against Bama. How can the committee tell TN with a straight face that the team you beat twice is getting the 1 over you?
 
#549
#549
If Florida wins vs Alabama I can see the argument that they get the last #1 seed. If Bama wins and then we beat Bama, we will have the same conference record, better overall record and better KenPom than Bama. Plus a 2-0 record heads up. What am I missing? You could easily flip the last 1 seed and first 2 seed if you are the committee.
 
  • Like
Reactions: utchs81, Chaz-Vol, Salvare and 1 other person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top