Your argument can easily be turned against you though. Tennessee's average is higher because they have less players. If OK shed their 8 worst players from their class, how much better would they get in average? If Tennessee added 8 more players would they most likely be 3* and a couple 4*? Probably and our ranking would be worse still than OK.Yes ... but this forum has tunnel vision when it comes to interpreting the 247 Sports football recruiting data. The entire focus is on the numerical rankings, with no considerations given to player rating averages or to the number of commitments each school has.
I honestly do believe that some of these posters think Oklahoma has a superior list of players committed .... when in fact, it has everything to do with quantity. Oklahoma is #8 in the 247 Class of 2024 team rankings. Tennessee is #14. That must mean Oklahoma's class is much better, right?
No considerations are ever allowed for the fact that Oklahoma has 28 commitments, while Tennessee has only 20 ... or for the fact that Tennessee's player ratings average is higher than Oklahoma's. In the minds of simple people with tunnel vision, a list is a list .... and there is only one way to interpret any list.
Ole Miss is cleaning up in the portal. Got both UT guys, WR from South Carolina, and looks like they get Walter Nolen as well. Still think UT has the better class?No, he's not.
Tennessee's class of 2024 is clearly better than Ole Miss's ... by any metric. They have zero 5 star commitments. Tennessee has two of them. Ole Miss has ten 4 star commitments, Tennessee has eleven. Tennesssee has a higher player rating average as well .... Hell, if you even just want to focus on the numerical ranking? Tennessee is still higher than Ole Miss ... and Ole Miss even has one more commitment than Tennessee does.
It sounds like you also think Tyler Baron is a big loss? He's not. If he had been projected to go high in the NFL Draft, that's where he would be going .... not Oxford, Mississippi.
Two of the teams ahead of us have a lower average recruit ranking (OU & LSU). A couple have 28 commits. And I'm sorry but I don't give a damn about that 91.99 from the other UT vs. our 91.33
No considerations are ever allowed for the fact that Oklahoma has 28 commitments, while Tennessee has only 20 .
The width and depth of your insider knowledge is astonishing.I think it became pretty obvious who the staff targeted to stay and who they didn't. Baron wasn't worth paying to stay a second time
The width and depth of your insider knowledge is astonishing.
You have absolutely NO IDEA who or what the staff targeted. You are just spewing nonsense to try and make your self feel better about the situation.
To each his own.
Why weren't the "HIGH RANKED studs" playing over Baron if they are so studly?No the lack of your ability to intuit what's going on is astonishing. Priority and paid: Mays, Eason, Pilli, Mincey. We have HIGH RANKED studs behind Baron. We are not paying him to stay and start over them for ONE year and risk losing our younger players. Same goes for McDonald Really not that hard to understand.
Why weren't the "HIGH RANKED studs" playing over Baron if they are so studly?
Don't be obtuse. If it takes a season or 2 to get a player acclimated to college football then they are not "HIGHLY RANKED studs." They are projects.Not sure if you are trolling or just being obtuse but freshman, even highly rated ones, need a year to develop their bodies and learn the defense. That's why they brought Baron back LAST year. That's why they let him go THIS year. Good grief man. Really not that hard to understand.
The bottom line with Ole Miss is they are pushing all of their chips to middle on one year. They are bringing in all these one and done transfers and spending money to have a shot at making the playoffs. After this Kiffen will take the Florida job, Ole Miss schedule will get tougher and they will be back to an 8 win ceiling team like a Kentucky or South Carolina. Since we don’t play them it does not matter. Hate to inform them…they still will not do better than 9-3. Joke will be on them ultimately.Ole Miss is cleaning up in the portal. Got both UT guys, WR from South Carolina, and looks like they get Walter Nolen as well. Still think UT has the better class?
Yes .... much better.Ole Miss is cleaning up in the portal. Got both UT guys, WR from South Carolina, and looks like they get Walter Nolen as well. Still think UT has the better class?
That involves conjecture, based on who they would get .... I'm not speculating. You are.Your argument can easily be turned against you though. Tennessee's average is higher because they have less players. If OK shed their 8 worst players from their class, how much better would they get in average? If Tennessee added 8 more players would they most likely be 3* and a couple 4*? Probably and our ranking would be worse still than OK.
So I'm not sold on your argument that OK is higher ranked just because they have more players. More players usually means more regression toward the mean which means the more players they add the worse their ranking would get because there are only so many 4 and 5* player to be had.
... and the job he is actually doing in the portal is so overrated. It's insane. Tyler Baron is an average rush end. McDonald is below average. It's not like they got James Pearce.The bottom line with Ole Miss is they are pushing all of their chips to middle on one year. They are bringing in all these one and done transfers and spending money to have a shot at making the playoffs. After this Kiffen will take the Florida job, Ole Miss schedule will get tougher and they will be back to an 8 win ceiling team like a Kentucky or South Carolina. Since we don’t play them it does not matter. Hate to inform them…they still will not do better than 9-3. Joke will be on them ultimately.
Great point....the spread is not awful, and is pretty much statistically meaningless, from 8 to 4Two of the teams ahead of us have a lower average recruit ranking (OU & LSU). A couple have 28 commits. And I'm sorry but I don't give a damn about that 91.99 from the other UT vs. our 91.33
2024 SEC Rankings
View attachment 603023