Alex Jones Getting His Comeuppance

#77
#77
the F-B-I recipient of a $90M award was never named or even referenced
 
#78
#78
Jones: The lizard people are putting chem trails in the skies and turning our frogs gay!

Everyone: Lol... Ok???

Jones: A cabal of interdimensional demons uses super secret technology to control the weather and create hurricanes!

Everyone: Lol... Ok???

Jones: Sandy Hook was a false flag and the families are crisis actors!

Everyone but leftists: *facepalm* Come on dude. Seriously. Not cool.

Leftists: Rabble rabble rabble rabble!!!! Dangerous Disinformation!!! Rabble rabble rabble!!! Defamation!!!


We all knew what Jones was. He was and is an entertaining larping troll. Prior to Sandy Hook, he was seen as having the market cornered on outrageous and entertaining conspiracy theories. Why, when he says this sh*t about Sandy Hook do we start getting outraged as if he is some sort of truth teller who has decided to say something outrageous for the first time? Why do we demand his head on a spike?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeTrain
#79
#79
SamRebel35 said:
We all knew what Jones was. He was and is an entertaining larping troll. Prior to Sandy Hook, he was seen as having the market cornered on outrageous and entertaining conspiracy theories. Why, when he says this sh*t about Sandy Hook do we start getting outraged as if he is some sort of truth teller who has decided to say something outrageous for the first time? Why do we demand his head on a spike?
Click to expand...

I agree, in large part. And I think Jones would have had a really good defense. While some of his statements might have crossed into defamation, I think there's a first amendment argument to be made.

That's why it was incredibly stupid for him to pout and stomp his feet and refuse to comply with court orders. He rode his refusal straight to a default verdict.
 
#80
#80
bamawriter said:
I agree, in large part. And I think Jones would have had a really good defense. While some of his statements might have crossed into defamation, I think there's a first amendment argument to be made.

That's why it was incredibly stupid for him to pout and stomp his feet and refuse to comply with court orders. He rode his refusal straight to a default verdict.
Click to expand...
He screwed up the free speech defense:

But in four separate lawsuits in Connecticut and Texas, Mr. Jones lost the opportunity to mount a First Amendment defense as he and his lawyers repeatedly failed to turn over documents, including financial records, ordered by the court. As a result, he was found liable in all four cases by default.
Click to expand...

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/10/12/us/alex-jones-verdict-sandy-hook
 
#81
#81
Sandman 423 said:
That looks like a man about to talk about something very painful, nothing more.
Click to expand...

This trial from the beginning was a complaint railroad job. Jones was hamstrung from a bias judge. Jones had no way of getting a fair trial. This was a trial that Russia, Cuba and China would be proud of.
 
#82
#82
bamawriter said:
I agree, in large part. And I think Jones would have had a really good defense. While some of his statements might have crossed into defamation, I think there's a first amendment argument to be made.

That's why it was incredibly stupid for him to pout and stomp his feet and refuse to comply with court orders. He rode his refusal straight to a default verdict.
Click to expand...

He couldn't make any defense statements, without being held in contempt. What's sad is the guy who ran over those those people at the parade will get more rights and more of a defense that jones did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#83
#83
happy-go_vol said:
This trial from the beginning was a complaint railroad job. Jones was hamstrung from a bias judge. Jones had no way of getting a fair trial. This was a trial that Russia, Cuba and China would be proud of.
Click to expand...

Multiple biased judges? Multiple judges in multiple states took the same action in response to Jones' obstinance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: n_huffhines
#84
#84
happy-go_vol said:
He couldn't make any defense statements, without being held in contempt.
Click to expand...

Right. Because he sacrificed his right to mount a defense by refusing to comply with court orders. He's not allowed to try and litigate the case during the penalty phase.

What's sad is the guy who ran over those those people at the parade will get more rights and more of a defense that jones did.
Click to expand...

Jones had the right to mount a defense and chose not to do so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeMojo
#85
#85
bamawriter said:
Right. Because he sacrificed his right to mount a defense by refusing to comply with court orders. He's not allowed to try and litigate the case during the penalty phase.



Jones had the right to mount a defense and chose not to do so.
Click to expand...

Nope, Jones was completely railroaded. From day one.
 
#86
#86
happy-go_vol said:
He couldn't make any defense statements, without being held in contempt. What's sad is the guy who ran over those those people at the parade will get more rights and more of a defense that jones did.
Click to expand...


What on Earth would be the defense ?????? I mean, what relevant argument could he possibly offer?
 
#87
#87
bamawriter said:
Multiple biased judges? Multiple judges in multiple states took the same action in response to Jones' obstinance.
Click to expand...

Seriously? It's obviously this was a complete scam. Yes, those judges were completely bias. I've been following this for a while. It's quite obvious
 
#89
#89
lawgator1 said:
What on Earth would be the defense ?????? I mean, what relevant argument could he possibly offer?
Click to expand...

The judge in the initial trial gave a verdict prior to the trial. She had made all these restrictions in which jones could not make statements without being held in contempt.it was a complete BS trial.
 
#91
#91
happy-go_vol said:
Seriously? It's obviously this was a complete scam. Yes, those judges were completely bias. I've been following this for a while. It's quite obvious
Click to expand...


What conclusions were incorrect? He repeatedly made those appalling claims. He caused damage to the families.

The serial, contemptible liar got his due. Hope it let's others know they too will be held accountable for similar nonsense.
 
#94
#94
lawgator1 said:
What conclusions were incorrect? He repeatedly made those appalling claims. He caused damage to the families.

The serial, contemptible liar got his due. Hope it let's others know they too will be held accountable for similar nonsense.
Click to expand...
No, its a complete BS politically motivated banana trial.
 
#95
#95
happy-go_vol said:
The judge in the initial trial gave a verdict prior to the trial.
Click to expand...

Correct. It's called a default verdict. It's what can happen as a sanction for failing to comply with orders. Jones and his legal team(s) knew that it was a possibility and chose obstinance.
She had made all these restrictions in which jones could not make statements without being held in contempt.it was a complete BS trial.
Click to expand...

Correct. Jones sacrificed his opportunity to mount a defense. He cannot wait until the penalty phase to do so.
 
#98
#98
These threads have been incredible. Karma coming home to roost for Jones would have been enjoyable enough by itself, but watching the Infowars fans simultaneously melt down and tell on themselves has made them so much better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: evillawyer
#99
#99
davethevol said:
Alex Jones is a jerk, but who did he specifically defame? If he spoke about a group of people without mentioning a specific person, that seems like a giant reach.
Click to expand...
Robbie Parker for one. He made videos of him, used his name, said he was a crisis actor and that his online tribute to his murdered 6 year old daughter was "disgusting"
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top