doozer
Matthew 6:2
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 15,091
- Likes
- 306
I emailed espn 30 for 30, asking when the dvd was gonna be available.. I also asked why the 85' sugar bowl wasn't mentioned, still waiting on a response, I'll keep you posted. If you wanna email them here's the address.
30for30@espn.com
Yeah, it was a little strange that the Sugar Bowl beatdown didn't get even a slight mention. I always thought the reason 1987 was so sweet for them was the failure of great teams to win big games at the end of 85 and 86. They talked about getting beaten by Penn State, but not us blowing their doors off the year earlier.
I can still remember seeing Miami blowing down the field and Vinny Testaverde hit Michael Irvin for a TD on their opening drive in the Sugar Bowl. I thought we were going to lose 100-0.
Just watched it after recording it last night. A few comments:
- In retrospect those teams were just good fun. None of their "brashness" should have been taken seriously. Just good entertainment.
- Interesting that the team they felt was their best couldn't win two huge bowl games (UT and Penn State). Remember at the time the Sugar Bowl kicked off they felt a win against UT would mean another #1 final ranking.
- The show only gives the perspective from past team participants view. Would love to have heard from Bozworth, Faust, Switzer, etc to get their perspective now of those UM teams.
- Reminders of Tom Mees early death always bothers me for some reason
- The early departure of Schnellenberger was somewhat strange; I never knew that was the reason
- Turner Gill didn't make a very good pass. Threw it behind the receiver. If he puts it between the numbers or on the left shoulder, Nebraska wins.
- Including Drew Rosenhaus in the documentary was of no value - wonder how muscled his way in for that piece of attention.
Just watched it after recording it last night. A few comments:
- In retrospect those teams were just good fun. None of their "brashness" should have been taken seriously. Just good entertainment.
- Interesting that the team they felt was their best couldn't win two huge bowl games (UT and Penn State). Remember at the time the Sugar Bowl kicked off they felt a win against UT would mean another #1 final ranking.
- The show only gives the perspective from past team participants view. Would love to have heard from Bozworth, Faust, Switzer, etc to get their perspective now of those UM teams.
- Reminders of Tom Mees early death always bothers me for some reason
- The early departure of Schnellenberger was somewhat strange; I never knew that was the reason
- Turner Gill didn't make a very good pass. Threw it behind the receiver. If he puts it between the numbers or on the left shoulder, Nebraska wins.
- Including Drew Rosenhaus in the documentary was of no value - wonder how muscled his way in for that piece of attention.