I never denied any of that. You are the one in denial. The coaching this season has been subpar. It may not be next year... I hope not. But this year it has been awful. I am neither an optimiist nor a pessimist. I look at what "is" and try to understand it. UK is not a guaranteed win. Nothing about my "attitude" has caused any of the historic lows this team has hit this year. Coaching... has been a big factor in it.
Do you really want me to list the things this staff has failed to do this year? I'd rather not since that probably wouldn't help much. But it would be things like his decision to "play not to lose" vs Vandy.
I never really thought Gruden wanted to put in the work needed at UT. I never got excited about him like so many others. Every time UT supposedly met a supposed demand... he seemed to come up with a higher bar. He just didn't want to do it.
Again, tell me SPECIFICALLY what CBJ should do with regards to coaching Team 117 which we all agree is simply cannot bet the top tier SEC teams? Don't need to hear what he is doing wrong, SPECIFICALLY tell me what CBJ should have done to make this team SEC Champions!!!
Nothing he could have done to make this team SEC Champions, but we don't all agree that this team cannot beat any top tier SEC teams (the players are good enough to win more than they have and be more competitive in loses, but the coaching has been pathetic).
Since you are asking here are 2 very specific examples of what CBJ should have done differently:
1. Should have kept Chaney and Pittman
2. Should have hired a real and proven DC instead of lying about brining in best staff in America.
Are those specific enough for you?
Thanks for chiming in as the Negavols just keep on coming. Now let't look at the facts, something Negavols don't like to address. First, if Chaney and Pittman are the next best thing to Neyland, tell me how are they doing in year 1 at their respective schools. Pittman went to a school that WAS ALREADY ON TOP. Chaney went to a school with more talent than us. How's he doing? Second point, best coaching staff in America, you obviously did not not get the main point I made twice or do you simply like to ignore facts. One more time, as simple as I can make it for you, the coaching staff cannot be adequately judged until we bring in some TALENT, period. Your negative attitude is premature, understand? I would say this coaching staff has won four, count me, conference CHAMPIONSHIPS in six years. Granted, not the SEC but it sure is an indicator of what they are capable of despite all the negative football pundits out there.Nothing he could have done to make this team SEC Champions, but we don't all agree that this team cannot beat any top tier SEC teams (the players are good enough to win more than they have and be more competitive in loses, but the coaching has been pathetic).
Since you are asking here are 2 very specific examples of what CBJ should have done differently:
1. Should have kept Chaney and Pittman
2. Should have hired a real and proven DC instead of lying about brining in best staff in America.
Are those specific enough for you?
Nothing he could have done to make this team SEC Champions, but we don't all agree that this team cannot beat any top tier SEC teams (the players are good enough to win more than they have and be more competitive in loses, but the coaching has been pathetic).
Since you are asking here are 2 very specific examples of what CBJ should have done differently:
1. Should have kept Chaney and Pittman
2. Should have hired a real and proven DC instead of lying about brining in best staff in America.
Are those specific enough for you?
Was that a specific enough answer for you?
Thanks for chiming in as the Negavols just keep on coming. Now let't look at the facts, something Negavols don't like to address. First, if Chaney and Pittman are the next best thing to Neyland, tell me how are they doing in year 1 at their respective schools. Pittman went to a school that WAS ALREADY ON TOP. Chaney went to a school with more talent than us. How's he doing? Second point, best coaching staff in America, you obviously did not not get the main point I made twice or do you simply like to ignore facts. One more time, as simple as I can make it for you, the coaching staff cannot be adequately judged until we bring in some TALENT, period. Your negative attitude is premature, understand? I would say this coaching staff has won four, count me, conference CHAMPIONSHIPS in six years. Granted, not the SEC but it sure is an indicator of what they are capable of despite all the negative football pundits out there.
Was that a specific enough answer for you?
:hi:
Specific but WRONG. Chaney and Pittman have already proven they could win with good talent in SEC (last year). They don't have that talent at Arkansas yet, but they will do well again once they get it. On the other hand, the best bearcat staff in America has not proven they can win in the SEC at all (their record in big east proves nothing regarding how their b-cat spread system can work vs SEC - people often compare CBJ with Kelly - how did Kelly do with his system and all the talent he wants at ND when he faced Saban? That is what I think we will continue to see from this staff vs elite SEC - regardless of what type of talent they get.
Time to eat for me but if you think Chaney and Pittman won LAST YEAR it's useless to continue this discussion. I rest my case, I'M HUNGRY and positive about our future ... GO VOLS!!!!!Specific but WRONG. Chaney and Pittman have already proven they could win with good talent in SEC (last year). They don't have that talent at Arkansas yet, but they will do well again once they get it. On the other hand, the best bearcat staff in America has not proven they can win in the SEC at all (their record in big east proves nothing regarding how their b-cat spread system can work vs SEC - people often compare CBJ with Kelly - how did Kelly do with his system and all the talent he wants at ND when he faced Saban? That is what I think we will continue to see from this staff vs elite SEC - regardless of what type of talent they get.
Time to eat for me but if you think Chaney and Pittman won LAST YEAR it's useless to continue this discussion. I rest my case, I'M HUNGRY and positive about our future ... GO VOLS!!!!!
I thought this previously too...apparently offence is right in this context..since you're revving at about 40 posts per thread, maybe you can memorize a composition textbook and teach in between taking apart and reassembling television consoles
Posted via VolNation Mobile
What is this "Negavol" stuff?
Code for "someone that doesn't see things my way"?
No, it is a slang term for people who always want to be negative, hence "nega," about the coaches an/or players. From reviewing your posts negavol fits you pretty well. For me, I prefer to recognize the challenges but build upon the positives until the coaching staff proves to me otherwise. If that makes me a "sunshine pumper" then so be it! I say it's great to be a Tennessee Vol!