I think I saw a stat where they had only trailed something like 97 seconds in their 3 games in the SECT. aTm is a good team, and much more deserving of a spot in the NCAAT than someone of the teams currently ahead of them.They’re in. They didn’t just eke into the sec finals. And with as bad as the bubble teams are it doesn’t take much to impress over that group
I still think we can get a 1 if we win the SECT
We would be 11-7 in Q1
Would have played more Q1 games than any other team
And won more than anyone with the exception of Kansas if they win today.
Simple. We are ranked 9th (I know selection different). Not jumping up to top 4 by beating Kentucky. Simply put, we would have to pass too many: Zags Zona Baylor UK Auburn Kansas Duke Purdue Villanova. Dont see it.
Simple. We are ranked 9th (I know selection different). Not jumping up to top 4 by beating Kentucky. Simply put, we would have to pass too many: Zags Zona Baylor UK Auburn Kansas Duke Purdue Villanova. Dont see it.
If we hold onto this, I deadass do not see a better resume than Tennessee. We won’t be a 1 seed, but it’s honestly a bit crazy we aren’t, with the wins we have (along with having zero bad losses).
We are firmly a 2 seed right now there is no question in my mind, if we win tomorrow we should have an outside chance at a 1 seedTotally agree, and think they should be a 2 seed... HOWEVER, I think committee makes them a 3 with UK and Auburn as 2s. Only bc they've been up there all year. Its crappy, but it is what it is.
Totally agree, and think they should be a 2 seed... HOWEVER, I think committee makes them a 3 with UK and Auburn as 2s. Only bc they've been up there all year. Its crappy, but it is what it is.
We are firmly a 2 seed right now there is no question in my mind, if we win tomorrow we should have an outside chance at a 1 seed
Totally agree, and think they should be a 2 seed... HOWEVER, I think committee makes them a 3 with UK and Auburn as 2s. Only bc they've been up there all year. Its crappy, but it is what it is.
Ok, if you say UM is carried by their NET than what’s the argument for Rutgers. With those two teams the media is arguing both sides of the coin.Yeah, Michigan has a NET that is artificially inflated by their Big 10 affiliation, but that record and early exit have to work against them at some point.