WoodsmanVol
It takes wisdom to understand wisdom.
- Joined
- May 12, 2010
- Messages
- 17,528
- Likes
- 13,512
I know. I really meant just the countries that Onelilreb brought up. I'm surprised that Australians were so compliant; they've always seemed much more independent - maybe in the end they aren't who we thought they were.
Australia doesn’t have a bill of rights the only rights mentioned in the AU constitution are the right to vote, freedom of religion(and that is limited), right to a trial by jury, can’t take your property under unjust terms(but the .gov decides the terms) and freedom from discrimination based on area of residency. There are no protections on free speech, assembly or the right to adress the .gov about grievances. Aussies are basically subjects to the whims of their provincial and central governments.
I'm not anti-gun, and I believe you know it. Liberals, independents like myself, and others who far rightists disdain, tend to be gun owners too. Like others among them, I don't believe military, or military-like weaponry is necessary. Especially when we see bigots, racists, the warped-brained, and just plain bloodthirsty protoplasmic excuses for humans using them to engage in mass murder. But forget it. All of this has been hashed over endlessly. The final truth is, gun lobbyists and their base customers, such as those listed in this post, don't give a day8um. It's almost like they get some form of sexual gratification from such weaponry use. With the muzzle flash being the seminal fluid, and the bullets being the sperm during thefiringevacuation. Over and out.
https://wgntv.com/news/illinois/pri...re-police-for-not-enforcing-illinois-gun-ban/
ILLINOIS
Pritzker threatens to fire police for not enforcing Illinois gun ban
I was intrigued until the whole seminal fluid thing. Granted some people feel guns give them a couple of “inches” of manhood. All of those people are morons. Military type weapons have nothing to do with giving a human being an increase or desire to kill. If the government really wanted to effect guns they can do it. Lobbyist should be eliminated from government period. You think pharmaceutical companies or guns kill more people each year? I’ll listen rationally to that response. You are really talking about ar-15’s and the like. What’s your soulution? To remove them from society? Where does that end? Litigation against gun manufacturers? Slippery slope. The problem is the enormous increase in mental illness. That’s what happens to a rudderless society my friend. We have no morals, sense of self worth or pride in family country or God. We are doomed brother liberal or conservative, democrats or republican. It’s not the guns it’s the mind behind the madness. You want to make some change? No one is able to purchase, transfer a gun or ammunition unless you have taken at least an 8 hour hunter safety course including hand gun permitting. No one is able to own or purchase a gun until the age of 21 unless you are a honorably discharged from military service. Those two things would change a lot. Pure confiscation or the restriction of an semi-automatic rifle is a pipe dream. And by the way. I have no idea whether you are anti gun or not. If you think it’s the guns then you are dead wrong. Tim Mcvey did more damage with fertilizer than an ar-15 could ever do.
shocked I tell you that she blamed her race
Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot blames loss on racism, gender