She hurt the program because she was an experienced player who would have been valuable in bringing along the freshmen. Even the two highly ranked point guards
Moriah Jefferson and Dangerfield had problems their first year. Dangerfield didn't even do so well the second year for such a highly rated player.
It's not unusual for freshmen to struggle their first year. Very few come right into college playing like all stars, It it could happen even though the odds are slim.
Second, with two players now gone, depth with experience becomes an issue. Recruiting will become much more important with the big 3 graduating next year.
The recruits coming in will probably be happy since they will get more minutes thereby making them more valuable the following year, although they will probably hit some bumps their first year. Unfortunately, first year experience might make them more likely a transfer possibility with 3 years eligibility left a la Destiny Slocum. If the big 3 can be replaced for the following season, it would minimize the chance of transfers, which seem to be a big problem in recent years.
It's good to be optimistic, but playing last year without Cooper was a bad example to use. Look at the record. Imagine what might have been achieved with a good point guard.
No reason not to be optimistic about next year, but it will be the big 3 that make it happen IMO.
Honesty is the best policy--and it would appear that there has not been honesty about the reason that Cooper has left the program. If she was kicked off the team or expelled, WHY has there been secrecy about it? The university or program should say that she was expelled or asked to leave the team because of a violation of school (or team) policy. Players get kicked off of teams regularly, and it is usually announced as such. The university and the basketball program owe Cooper nothing, it seems to me, regardless of whether she chose to transfer (doubtful) or whether she was expelled or forced to leave. Cooper has created difficulties for the program. Why create the impression that SHE was dissatisfied at UT and chose to transfer--to our conference rival, no less--if that is not actually case? That's bad PR for UT, as I see it, and why create bad PR for yourself when the player's conduct was the issue?
You've got some good points. Hayes & Westbrook, from their High School reputations certainly could have Slocum like capability from the get go. And, I agree one bad apple....How do we know that last years record isn't indicative of her (Te'a) being on the team? Maybe this incident and when it occured alongside others things that lead to her dismissal (or transfer) from the university was part of the reason we performed the way we did.
She was a freshman when she last played and then spent last season rehabbing an injury. She (imo) would still be a freshman (getting herself back into game shape and etc.) the first half of the season. Could we have liked to not throw the freshman in so soon, sure but we don't have that luxury and there may be an adjustment period but there could also be a Destiny Slocum like performance that would make folk forget about Te'a and forget that Hayes or Westbrook are in fact freshman.
Honesty is the best policy--and it would appear that there has not been honesty about the reason that Cooper has left the program. If she was kicked off the team or expelled, WHY has there been secrecy about it? The university or program should say that she was expelled or asked to leave the team because of a violation of school (or team) policy. Players get kicked off of teams regularly, and it is usually announced as such. The university and the basketball program owe Cooper nothing, it seems to me, regardless of whether she chose to transfer (doubtful) or whether she was expelled or forced to leave. Cooper has created difficulties for the program. Why create the impression that SHE was dissatisfied at UT and chose to transfer--to our conference rival, no less--if that is not actually case? That's bad PR for UT, as I see it, and why create bad PR for yourself when the player's conduct was the issue?
Actually, Cooper got the short-end of this mess. Kudos to her,she's going to miss being a part of what's about to go down. And it's going to be Awesome.
One item of clarification:
The University used the term "suspension".
One item of curiosity:
Cooper is granted release to any school she chooses. Middleton is granted release to any school except any school in the SEC.
Why must you assume DISHONESTY? Some matters and details of matters are not public information.
You seem to have this attitude of undue privilege. Did you spend a lot of time in the North?
I live in a trailer in rural Tennessee. I've got a rusty car and old tires sitting in my front yard. I like to listen to banjo music on Sundays after we handle snakes in the primitive fundamentalist church. I don't get my news from any fancy-dancy fake big-city newspaper but rather from a some fat guy sitting in his basement in Mobile. I send money to televangelists because they tell me I'll be saved if I do, though it means that I have to give up biscuits with gravy at Cracker Barrel a couple of times every month. We could be neighbors!
One item of clarification:
The University used the term "suspension".
One item of curiosity:
Cooper is granted release to any school she chooses. Middleton is granted release to any school except any school in the SEC.
Technically, Jefferson isn't current either, and Dangerfield never led her team to a NC as a freshman point guard.
Edwards and Head did win NCs as freshmen respectively.
Why would you even want to go to South Carolina who is basically Tennessee rival at this point?
I meant Jefferson. She didn't come on strong until near her 3rd year. My point was it's not so easy coming into college. It takes a while, particularly for point guards.
No doubt sitting out 2 years is not good. But if she hadn't left Tennessee, it would have been just 1 year.
Ask Kevin Durant.