Dan Mullen

#232
#232
Neither one of them is the answer. If we hire Dan mullen, get ready for a bunch of 8-4 seasons. We might get lucky and sneak in a 10-3 season with a loss in the SECCG every once in a while, which is basically Fulmer after 2001.
 
#233
#233
If we wanted someone whose team laid down in the second half against rivals, we could have just kept Dooley.

Funny how all the Mullen slurpers have disappeared in the second half, much like his team.
 
#234
#234
emainvol said:
If we wanted someone whose team laid down in the second half against rivals, we could have just kept Dooley.

Funny how all the Mullen slurpers have disappeared in the second half, much like his team.
Click to expand...

Dude, Charlie Strong lost to Syracuse.
 
#237
#237
perico said:
Neither one of them should be anywhere near Knoxville except on the other side of the field.
Click to expand...

Are you kidding, Dan Mullen is about to be 8 and ****ing 4. Not even kidding you. Even after taking this ass pounding from Ole Miss, he is going to be 8-4. Beat a juggernaut Auburn team to get there, too.
 
#241
#241
emainvol said:
Well, they are beating MSU by almost 4 TDs, so I guess Syracuse would have a fighting chance in that game, too.
Click to expand...

What does that even mean?? Do you even understand my point that losing to Ole Miss is not the same as losing to Syracuse or did you read my post and say yes if Ole Miss could LITERALLY beat Syracuse by 2 TDs then MSU losing by 4 TDs by conversion means that they would be tied up... If that's the "argument" your sticking to then that's fine. But Ole Miss >> Syracuse and you know it
 
#242
#242
pharmDvol11 said:
What does that even mean?? Do you even understand my point that losing to Ole Miss is not the same as losing to Syracuse or did you read my post and say yes if Ole Miss could LITERALLY beat Syracuse by 2 TDs then MSU losing by 4 TDs by conversion means that they would be tied up... If that's the "argument" your sticking to then that's fine. But Ole Miss >> Syracuse and you know it
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter who is better, Mullen just got his dick kicked. If you had watched the game, perhaps you would stop with the ridiculous argument that he is somehow a good football coach.
 
#243
#243
Mullen in my book is not a proven coach. A proven coach to me is someone that's been around the block a time or too and still knows how to win games with huge talent or little talent. Dooley had little talent at La tech and didn't win games and he was at Tennessee and had pretty darn good talent and still did not win games. Tonight mullen got his rear end handed to him against a ole miss team that isn't as good talent wise as miss. State. I also understand people have bad games, but he still not an all out proven coach.
 
#244
#244
emainvol said:
Doesn't matter who is better, Mullen just got his dick kicked. If you had watched the game, perhaps you would stop with the ridiculous argument that he is somehow a good football coach.
Click to expand...

I watched the game and he got outcoached... by another SEC coach! Say what you want about Mullen. Did you watch Louisville's 2 straight losses? I would say Strong got his junk ran thru a meat grinder in the Syracuse game... And then losing in like 3 OTs against UConn? Are you going to praise Charlie Strong and Louisville for that?
 
#245
#245
gobraves101035 said:
Mullen in my book is not a proven coach. A proven coach to me is someone that's been around the block a time or too and still knows how to win games with huge talent or little talent. Dooley had little talent at La tech and didn't win games and he was at Tennessee and had pretty darn good talent and still did not win games. Tonight mullen got his rear end handed to him against a ole miss team that isn't as good talent wise as miss. State. I also understand people have bad games, but he still not an all out proven coach.
Click to expand...

Blasphemy. Dude, he once beat Michigan. Seriously man, Michigan.
 
#246
#246
pharmDvol11 said:
I watched the game and he got outcoached... by another SEC coach! Say what you want about Mullen. Did you watch Louisville's 2 straight losses? I would say Strong got his junk ran thru a meat grinder in the Syracuse game... And then losing in like 3 OTs against UConn? Are you going to praise Charlie Strong and Louisville for that?
Click to expand...

Give Charlie Strong comparable talent and he beats Dan Mullen by 3 TDs every single time.
 
#249
#249
gobraves101035 said:
Winning one big game doesn't mean your a proven coach. That's like saying dooley is proven just because we really won that lsu game if it weren't for too many people on the field.
Click to expand...

He beat Georgia once, too. Georgia was 6-7 that year, but did you know they once won a national championship?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top