LSU-SIU
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2010
- Messages
- 10,922
- Likes
- 5,589
I admit, I don't get that reasoning either. It may be late in the political game but no one can predict what events are right around the corner. the question is do you want a mentally incompetent president dealing with those potentials?
Those were campaign promises that he was unable to deliver on. And I didn't hear any of that in the debate anyway. I could be wrong, but I don't recall any of that coming up.fixing the debt. getting mexico to pay for the wall. no terrorist attacks when he was president. removing obamacare. getting NATO to pay their fair share. draining the swamp. locking up Hillary. all just off the top of my head.
Well strictly speaking from a political angle, giving her a few months in the presidency where people could maybe get a better sense of who she is... where her advisors could help her appear more presidential is the best move for the D Party. Are they just going to take the Mulligan and watch djt get elected?She's just not all there. She's a poster child for inanity even in serious situations.
Well strictly speaking from a political angle, giving her a few months in the presidency where people could maybe get a better sense of who she is... where her advisors could help her appear more presidential is the best move for the D Party. Are they just going to take the Mulligan and watch djt get elected?