KB5252
Repeat Forward Progress Victim
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 37,199
- Likes
- 35,329
His larynx and hyoid were intact. No evidence of compression like petechial hemorrhaging or bruising in the neck and upper back. His injuries were superficial on his face. He was a walking dead man the minute he swallowed the drugs. Did you read the autopsy report septic?
It doesn’t, no petechial hemorrhage or bruising in the neck or upper back area. His heart condition coupled with drugs killed him.
That makes sense. My only objection is that the first Autopsy ruled death due to Fentanyl or something to that effect. It seems like the second Autopsy could have been conducted with political motives in mind. I don’t think their conclusion is unreasonable I can just see a non medical rationale behind why they reversed the first decisionYou've seen the video, right? I mean, you do know that Chauvin had his knee on the dudes back and neck for ten minutes. Lol, wtf are you even talking about, the drugs and heart troubles were a loaded gun, but Chauvin pulled the trigger.
It’s highly conflicting. His medical conditions, the blockages in his LAD 75% and most of his RCAIf that's the case then why did two ME's list death as homicide? It's a serious question because the ME's report contains conflicting info.
Gf was a dead man before Chauvin did that. WTF I’M TALKING ABOUT is I think you’ve forgotten the pathophysiology of the disease processes present in gf coupled with the drugs in his system and the related outcomes. Once they cuffed him they were responsible for his welfare, Chauvin and the 2 others showed disregard of gf statements he couldn’t breath. If he sat next to the car with no pressure on him I feel pretty safe in saying he would have died. If he was put in the cruiser I feel pretty safe in saying he would have died. Fentanyl leaching into your system will do that. Along with the other cadre of drugs inside him.You've seen the video, right? I mean, you do know that Chauvin had his knee on the dudes back and neck for ten minutes. Lol, wtf are you even talking about, the drugs and heart troubles were a loaded gun, but Chauvin pulled the trigger.
Lawyers: for the people.For either side, what kind of man Floyd was, good or bad, is irrelevant. This kind of crap is what’s driving verdicts up in our country. I see it all the time with large truck accidents. Attorneys don’t argue the facts of what happened, they argue that the big bad trucking company killed this poor family person and so they need to pay, never mind that the poor family person was drunk, crossed center, and slammed into the truck that was steady in their lane and not speeding. That CDL driver should have seen it coming and/or the truck shouldn’t have been there.
Interesting. Some is this I was not aware of.It’s highly conflicting. His medical conditions, the blockages in his LAD 75% and most of his RCA
( both these supply the ventricles ) thickening of both his ventricles of the heart, no evidence of compression of breathing structure, no evidence of hemorrhaging or bruising in and around neck and back.
The statement of both ME’s about the condition of the lung tissue being inundated with fluid coupled with the above is pretty conclusive to his heart failing secondary to drug effect leading to pulmonary edema which caused his death. The whole time he was in custody fentanyl was leaching into his system slowly overriding the amphetamines.
Ignoring his statements about not being able to breathe were dangerous. He was drowning in his own lung fluid.
If he hadn’t passed that fake bill
If he wasn’t hopped up on amphetamines
If he hadn’t swallowed a lethal dose of fentanyl
If Chauvin didn’t show wanton disregard for the condition of someone in his custody and who he was responsible for
GF killed himself Chauvin is guilty of watching it happen without acting.
His brain did not show signs of vessel hemorrhaging, no petechial hemorrhaging in eyes, the process that killed him was solely in the chest with heart failing and pulmonary edema related to condition and drugs.You should call the M.E. and the other forensic pathologist that conducted the autopsy and explain how thier conclusions are too inconsistent for you.
They both said that the asphyxiation/MI were as a result of compression to the neck. A hyoid is usually broken through strangulation which is different force from compression, no?
Gf was a dead man before Chauvin did that. WTF I’M TALKING ABOUT is I think you’ve forgotten the pathophysiology of the disease processes present in gf coupled with the drugs in his system and the related outcomes. Once they cuffed him they were responsible for his welfare, Chauvin and the 2 others showed disregard of gf statements he couldn’t breath. If he sat next to the car with no pressure on him I feel pretty safe in saying he would have died. If he was put in the cruiser I feel pretty safe in saying he would have died. Fentanyl leaching into your system will do that. Along with the other cadre of drugs inside him.
You can theorize that he may have died without Chauvin putting his knee on GF's neck - and you may be right. However we can say for certain that the compression of the larynx resulted in either asphyxiation or an MI or both as was noted on the two autopsy's by the three pathologists as the cause of death.
Chauvin Trial: Fact-checking George Floyd's death and drug claims | khou.com
If the drugs and heart disease were what was ruled to have killed him, the manner of death would not have been ruled a homicide and Chauvin wouldn't be in the hot seat.
If someone gets shot in the chest and die and on autopsy they're found to Stage 4 have lung cancer and 99% blockage in the coronary artery's, the cause of death is still a GSW to the chest and ruled a homicide despite the fact that they were on deaths door already. In other words, what may have been is secondary to what is.
But it's possible is it not? Especially considering we know the amount of drugs in his system was much greater than what is considered lethal. That is reasonable doubt.Exactly. To say that Floyd died of a drug overdose is to make the completely unknowable claim that he was going to drop dead whether or not the cops ever touched him. It's to point to the video and say "You're watching that man OD."
But it's possible is it not?
Especially considering we know the amount of drugs in his system was much greater than what is considered lethal. That is reasonable doubt.
Chauvin can be the worst pos on earth but is it possible Floyd OD'd?