Derek Chauvin trial

What race is most likely to have atrial fibrillation, ALS, cystic fibrosis, osteoporosis, aortic aneurism, Barrett’s esophagus, bladder cancer, endometriosis, IBD, melanoma, MS, macular degeneration, spina bifida, Crohn’s disease, or testicular cancer?

Like I said, your stance is ignorant and doesn’t deserve the attention you’re seeking. Enjoy.
Bless your heart, your deflection is substandard and irrelevant as usual. You must really hate science.

But go ahead, back up yourself up with evidence.

To quote every libt@rd here, LINK??!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
He said “They are the race most susceptible to every form of disease and ailment out there. Except malaria.”

How is it an odd choice to point out exactly how wrong that nimrod statement is?
Its funny how spun up you are on this that you take an obvious tongue in cheek reference based in generalities and lose your mind over it. You been taking night classes at Septics Skool for Theenking Badder?

Is the part that bothers you the most that almost all of the diseases that being black makes you high risk are preventable per science? lol
 
He said “They are the race most susceptible to every form of disease and ailment out there. Except malaria.”

How is it an odd choice to point out exactly how wrong that nimrod statement is?
Ah. I thought you were upset about the specific parts. I see your reasoning with that.

Not saying I agree or disagree but the retort at least makes more sense
 
  • Like
Reactions: OHvol40
Yes after reading 64’s comments I wanted to go burn down my town. ( extreme sarcasm )
What unity do you seek pg? Forced unity doesn’t work. Holding something above someone’s head and saying if you don’t support us here is the consequences. That’s not unity, it’s exacting conformity under duress.
64 is correct in his synopsis of everyone is covering their butts right now and it’s apparent. For a chief to deny training that is used and documented in academy is covering his ass and the departments. The prosecution is covering their asses by bringing in coached witnesses that should never be on a stand and quadrupling down on expert testimony cause they just couldn’t get what they wanted with the initial autopsy and ME. You aren’t necessarily getting the truth in a trial you are getting what is allowed in and plenty of theater.
GF Buddy that was in the car with him, not testifying and already acknowledged he will plead the fifth. Covering his own butt and/or not willing to testify about GF actions that day. It is his right.
When the rubber hits the road in these big trials everyone covers their buts because we live in a litigious society. Not sure how many years you have been on this earth, but that’s reality of all situations like this.

Oh so you have watched the trial? If so, you know the Chief perjured himself how? And all the other police experts damning Chauvin's actions, too? Interesting too, I mention unity is damn near impossible to achieve becasue uninformed people are not willing to alrter their bias based on facts of this trial and you reply with forced unity doesn't work. Telling rely. I'm sure you know what the interpretation of your reply means so I want to give you an opportunity to clarify your position before replying to that part of your reply
 
He said “They are the race most susceptible to every form of disease and ailment out there. Except malaria.”

How is it an odd choice to point out exactly how wrong that nimrod statement is?
You picked the white race with listed diseases to oppose his black race with listed diseases to counter his argument. I’m looking at your list and saying yep white people issues. Just like I looked at his list and said yep black peoples issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and Rickyvol77
Bless your heart, your deflection is substandard and irrelevant as usual. You must really hate science.

But go ahead, back up yourself up with evidence.

To quote every libt@rd here, LINK??!
You can do your own research if you don’t believe me, Neanderthal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
You picked the white race with listed diseases to oppose his black race with listed diseases to counter his argument. I’m looking at your list and saying yep white people issues. Just like I looked at his list and said yep black peoples issues.

I'm pretty sure cancer, stroke and heart disease, etc. are "all people issues" but ya'll want to see race in everything. sad.
 
Oh so you have watched the trial? If so, you know the Chief perjured himself how? And all the other police experts damning Chauvin's actions, too? Interesting too, I mention unity is damn near impossible to achieve becasue uninformed people are not willing to alrter their bias based on facts of this trial and you reply with forced unity doesn't work. Telling rely. I'm sure you know what the interpretation of your reply means so I want to give you an opportunity to clarify your position before replying to that part of your reply
I have heard his statements from the witness chair, have seen the training material. They contradict each other. What do you call evidence that will be entered by the defense to impugn previous testimony given by those witnesses? I call it what a good defense attorney would do.

You just added a qualifier to your unity statement that wasn’t there before and then chastise me smugly for not knowing it. Brilliant, I believe the mature arguers on here call it moving the goal posts.

My statement on forced unity stands as written. I was not unclear. Your “interpretation” is all you.
 
I'm pretty sure cancer, stroke and heart disease, etc. are "all people issues" but ya'll want to see race in everything. sad.
As much as some would like to make this about race it’s not, it’s medical facts. Certain races are prone to certain conditions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Here's the source of your article. Tgis is an excellent example of why you guys hated the MSM so much. Your news sources deny facts and print their version of reality (lies) they know you want to hear. You know like the invaders of the Capital building were really Antifa even though those arrested were mostly Proud Boys and other white supremist groups as is your news source. You can try to hide it behind the face of Jesus but you relly (really) can't”


I posted it simply for discussion of the statements of the forensic pathologist. Was not even paying attention to the news source and am only vaguely familiar with WJ. Regardless of what you copy and pasted wrt WJ, that has nothing to do with the testimony presented by the pathologist. I posted it simply for discussion, but people are right to question MSM for a host of reasons. Rebut, counter or discuss the pathologist’s statements if you can or would like to, but your projecting and accusatory tripe toward me is way off target and duly noted.
 
Last edited:
I have heard his statements from the witness chair, have seen the training material. They contradict each other. What do you call evidence that will be entered by the defense to impugn previous testimony given by those witnesses? I call it what a good defense attorney would do.

You just added a qualifier to your unity statement that wasn’t there before and then chastise me smugly for not knowing it. Brilliant, I believe the mature arguers on here call it moving the goal posts.

My statement on forced unity stands as written. I was not unclear. Your “interpretation” is all you.

it’s called defense.
So no you haven’t watched the trial therefore haven’t heard the testimony with your own ears. Relying on the reporting of others. So who did you wAtch/listen too?

Unity is unity. Is Forced unity the term coined by you really unity?
 

The sworn testimony of the medical examiner who conducted the autopsy is quoted above. His actual testimony is different than the right wing Jesus loving Western Journal

Did Biden win the election fair and square?
 
I have heard his statements from the witness chair, have seen the training material. They contradict each other. What do you call evidence that will be entered by the defense to impugn previous testimony given by those witnesses? I call it what a good defense attorney would do.

You just added a qualifier to your unity statement that wasn’t there before and then chastise me smugly for not knowing it. Brilliant, I believe the mature arguers on here call it moving the goal posts.

My statement on forced unity stands as written. I was not unclear. Your “interpretation” is all you.

Did Biden win the election fair and square?
 
Right now a cardiologist is explaining exactly what I tried to explain to the EMT that was peddling the overdose fallacy on here.
He had to edit his dumb statement about the junkie.
 
This cardiologist on the stand is going to be tough for the defense to beat. He’s all in on the prosecution’s case.
 
This cardiologist on the stand is going to be tough for the defense to beat. He’s all in on the prosecution’s case.

Yes, the prosecution has had a couple good days in a row.

The defense attorney kinda sucks though. I imagine Chauvlin is paying A LOT of money and he's gotta be disappointed with the results
 
This cardiologist on the stand is going to be tough for the defense to beat. He’s all in on the prosecution’s case.
Look at ktown trying to prime people to be angry with a non murder case. George Floyd resisted arrest and ate fentanyl til he overdosed. No big loss. Floyd was a career criminal that pointed guns at fetuses. Feel free to let Minneapolis burn though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64

VN Store



Back
Top