So 5 jobs will be filled that would have went empty. One of them will do a great job and the other 4 will not be rehired?
I'm not seeing the problem.
The problem is the teachers unions and their partners, the Universities that “educate “ and certify teachers losing control of the hiring process and potentially the billions of dollars in union dues that go along with it. Teachers unions exist to educate like McDonald’s exists to provide nutrition.
Ok. I'll try again.I pointed out how many days the teachers in my child’s district work. I specifically pointed out what they are off for and added it up. I also never threw out a dollar figure, that was another poster. Try again.
That's equivalent to about 66k annually if working full 12 months. Starting out.
Sounds like you are in full agreement. His numbers are recalculating 47k at 8 1/2 months to 12 month, which as I said, is total BS.Yes sir. Plus retirement. Not sure what their situation is with medical/dental etc. I guess it varies from district to district.
Still unclear where you get 4 bad hires.
Why is a college educated experienced teaching professional making bad hires at such a high rate?
The whole premise. Take away all requirements and you will have the biggest pool of qualified candidates. That's your premise.I'm obviously right. It's not even a debatable question. Lowering the standard will obviously increase the pool of talented qualified candidates. What about that could you possible disagree with?
Ok. I'll try again.
The first post below is the dollar figure.
Your response follows.
Sounds like you are in full agreement. His numbers are recalculating 47k at 8 1/2 months to 12 month, which as I said, is total BS.
Nobody works 12 months. The average is 230 days.
Compare 8.5 to 10 if you wish. Or 10 to 11.5.
Greater success to me would mean an increase is kids graduating HS with employable skills, greater proficiency in math and language and fewer kids needing remedial classes in college.
Because it is hard to know before you actually see them in action, which is precisely why observed student teaching is of such critical importance. One shouldn't need a college degree to understand that simple concept.Still unclear where you get 4 bad hires.
Why is a college educated experienced teaching professional making bad hires at such a high rate?
Because it is hard to know before you actually see them in action, which is precisely why observed student teaching is of such critical importance. One shouldn't need a college degree to understand that simple concept.
I have no idea what their success rate was, but whatever it was, it was completely overshadowed and rendered mostly moot by their decision to cheat.And I went back and clarified my statement by saying that my premise was that teachers got about an extra month and a half. You went all the way back and multi quoted all of that but still can’t answer my simple question about the success rate of teachers in the APS cheating scandal. Bad boy……
Absolutely.
What?You mean to make sure that they don’t do anything like participating in the falsification of standardized test scores for financial gain??