W.TN.Orange Blood
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Messages
- 127,421
- Likes
- 327,628
I think that is why she emphasized defense and rebounding would be key with a relatively high number of TOs. Also, do you really think it would be a good idea to”say to Andrea” anything? Think she probably knows a lot more than anyone posting here.Well I would say to Andrea that defense was not the key to the win today ......If Vandy had just hit 35 % of their wide open three pointers today they would have won.Auburn hit their shots and beat us with all the turnovers we made ...same as Florida .
In the NCAA tourney if they have 19 turnovers ( like they did today ) and run into a team that gets hot from 3 point line ,they are likely to go out in the 1st round.
Madtown, as we all know, both LSU and SC have the guards who can cause lots of turnovers, and the speed to score a lot of points off of them. So to beat either of them would be the absolute best wins of the season for Tennessee. We stand a better chance of beating LSU at home, of course -- IF Key can stay on the floor. And maybe if Poynter can find it in her heart to finally have an average game. lol
The game at SC? It would feel like a win to me if we kept it within 12-14. I know that sounds bad, and I'm not even saying it's impossible we could beat them. But this year, in THEIR packed arena? That game was circled on my pre-season calendar as the most highly probable loss of the season, and that hasn't changed. I just want Tennessee to find a way to keep it respectable. Hell, even if they were to lose by 20 they could still look respectable doing it by not EVER hanging their heads and making fewer "bloopers reel"-quality turnovers. I'm talking about the really bad ones that are best viewed as the "Benny Hill" theme plays.
But OMG, if Tennessee could somehow win BOTH games? Pretty sure that would turn women's college basketball on its head. It doesn't hurt to dream!
Respect to Key for her efforts, but everything about her game is too slow--movements, reaction, shots, all of it. When you get the ball in the paint, you need to be decisive and get rid of the ball quickly--either by shooting, making a quick, strong move and shooting, or passing the ball. If you are not decisive and act quickely, defenders will collapse on you and you may lose the ball. I'm not at all sure why we even play through the post as much as we do. Offensively,we'd be much better off playing small, but then we'd lose Key on defense. It's a dilemma.
I agree. If Key just had a little bit of attitude or an aggressive bone in her body, She would be a force. Don’t get me wrong she’s talented and the LV need her. But she plays soft a lot.Respect to Key for her efforts, but everything about her game is too slow--movements, reaction, shots, all of it. When you get the ball in the paint, you need to be decisive and get rid of the ball quickly--either by shooting, making a quick, strong move and shooting, or passing the ball. If you are not decisive and act quickely, defenders will collapse on you and you may lose the ball. I'm not at all sure why we even play through the post as much as we do. Offensively,we'd be much better off playing small, but then we'd lose Key on defense. It's a dilemma.
I agree her decision making has been slower for some reason in the last couple weeks than it was early in the season. Depends on who we play whether were better going small. Against Vandy that certainly looked to be true. Against other teams with a big center or inside game she has to play and usually plays better in those games than when we play the smaller teams.Respect to Key for her efforts, but everything about her game is too slow--movements, reaction, shots, all of it. When you get the ball in the paint, you need to be decisive and get rid of the ball quickly--either by shooting, making a quick, strong move and shooting, or passing the ball. If you are not decisive and act quickely, defenders will collapse on you and you may lose the ball. I'm not at all sure why we even play through the post as much as we do. Offensively,we'd be much better off playing small, but then we'd lose Key on defense. It's a dilemma.
She always turns toward the double team!!!Respect to Key for her efforts, but everything about her game is too slow--movements, reaction, shots, all of it. When you get the ball in the paint, you need to be decisive and get rid of the ball quickly--either by shooting, making a quick, strong move and shooting, or passing the ball. If you are not decisive and act quickely, defenders will collapse on you and you may lose the ball. I'm not at all sure why we even play through the post as much as we do. Offensively,we'd be much better off playing small, but then we'd lose Key on defense. It's a dilemma.
I agree her decision making has been slower for some reason in the last couple weeks than it was early in the season. Depends on who we play whether were better going small. Against Vandy that certainly looked to be true. Against other teams with a big center or inside game she has to play and usually plays better in those games than when we play the smaller teams.
Well I would say to Andrea that defense was not the key to the win today ......If Vandy had just hit 35 % of their wide open three pointers today they would have won.Auburn hit their shots and beat us with all the turnovers we made ...same as Florida .
In the NCAA tourney if they have 19 turnovers ( like they did today ) and run into a team that gets hot from 3 point line ,they are likely to go out in the 1st round.
Part of the problem is how they feed Tamari.
If the ball comes in low the smaller players simply collapse on her and take it before she can get it up.
You have to feed her high, and then she has to keep it high.
Another problem is getting her base set when she receives the ball. That can't always be done, but taking a dribble to realign just isn't possible most of the time so you have to have your move ready, and your feet set properly for it before you receive the ball.
It's tough when they get to shove you off balance as they did several times in this game without any calls being made. Once they called Key for a travel when Vandy shoved her while she had the ball. Not a thing in the world you can do about that other than turn the film into the league for them to ignore.
Walker and Miles are short enough that they have trouble judging how to lob the ball in, Horston does a better job of it. But they can all improve if it is made a priority.
I thought our defense except the first and last 5 minutes of the game was very good other than a few successful screens. It is good defense to leave poor shooters open for 3s and choking off the other options. Good teams have been doing this to us as well, forcing 3s from poor long range shooters while making it hard to get shots in the paint.The answer to your question is that Vandy shot a terrible percentage despite being wide open on many occasion.If you watched the game you would agree with that comment .Otherwise you are just being a contrarian.
Just looking at the box score, 7 of the LVs 19 were attributed to Tamari. Most of those where situations where she got swarmed on the entry pass or could not quite gather the ball. Other posters have talked about the need for Tamari to be stronger in the post but sometimes the LVs need a plan B to forcing the ball inside to TK. There was another TO that involved Striplin where Steffi Sorenson rightly noted that even if Karo had been able to grab the pass, she was in a terrible position on the court. This problem should be solvable. If a team is packing the paint, LVs players have to be willing to take the open 3.