volsforever27
I ain't dead yet *****
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2007
- Messages
- 19,221
- Likes
- 2,187
We're definately in a tough spot geographically, sitting between you guys and Ohio State. The important thing is to continue building. Coach Brooks vows to be even better this year. We'll see. They have the talent at running back, but the QB and WR's is a huge question. The defense is supposed to be the best Brooks has had. Like I said, we'll see.I don't see that happening this year... alst year was your best shot.
His lengthy holdout also played a role in this and made him no friends as a rookie.
This is off topic, but Couch was the best QB in the country coming out as a junior. He began the process of making Kentucky respectable on the college football scene. As a matter of fact, Tennessee and Ohio State were chomping at the bit to get him. He just decided to stay home.
Maybe this country needs a solid conservative democrat. Someone who can be for the working man without living in the far left Land of Oz.
Shuler would have my support. Especially if he continues introducing bills like the Save Act.
Home Page | United States Representative Heath Shuler
It's amazing how the offenses Peyton Manning plays in always seem to be more "talented".
I think Charlier Garner was gone by the time Peyton started playing. James Stewart and Jamal Lewis each only played one year with Peyton. Jay Graham was pretty good, though.
My fault, I get Garner and Graham confused......You are correct. i have "The Tennessee Rifles" print in my office with Peyton, and Graham on it. My mistake.
Peyton did have very good (great) backs!
Um, that was me you seem to be calling out. Graham had a very good year in '95, but what did he do in '96? The o-line was terrible that year, and he had no running game in '97 until they let Lewis have playing time. If I'm wrong, then prove otherwise.
Nowhere did I mention '94 or '95.
I'm not "calling annyone out." Peyton had very good backs. Graham had 800 yrds in 96 with 11 tds, and only 179 carries (4.6 per carry). not that bad! He got hurt ...I think? I could be wrong.
I understand what I am about to post probably comes from my orange colored glasses and tin foil hat, but I swear it seemed to me that Frerotte seemed to have noticably more time in the pocket than Shuler. When Shuler came in it was like he was immediately running for his life. I often wondered if his linemen tried a little harder for the regular joe than the greedy holdout.Frerotte played sort of okay as a rookie. Shuler played a little bit less than sort of okay, but neither of them played very well at all. Shuler's problem was that he held out so long that he never caught up to Frerotte in terms of the playbook, running the offense, etc., so Frerotte came out of training camp "ahead" of him, and when they were both bad, the fans turned entirely on Shuler in favor of the 7th round, lunchpail guy. It really was like a good v. evil thing: Shuler was the greedy holdout; Frerotte was the regular joe from a small school. There was not much difference in their play -- and really, the whole team around them sucked too, so how much success could either of them have had? -- but everybody loved Frerotte the Underdog. Shuler was done before he ever set foot on the field.
His lengthy holdout also played a role in this and made him no friends as a rookie.
As bad as Curry was, he didn't try a fake with the punter trying to run on 4th and forever. Good ol Hal. I never saw so many people at a game wonder aloud about the opposition's call.