Jobs? What jobs? Driving up and down the pipe trying to clean it up once something happens to it? Okay that was a joke but honestly I don't see many jobs coming from this other than the construction of it. I'm not an expert though, to take a line from the GOP "I'm not a scientist" crowd.
Wether you believe it or not, a lot of Americans care about the earth that we live on. So listening to them is part of his job.
Try "Both"
Nice word to add to your vocabulary.
Wondered about that. I've been seeing a whole hoop of Haliburton vehicles running around this part of the State.
I'm sorry you're right, the savings that occur after it is easier to transport energy will definitely trickle down to us. History shows us that when corporations find ways to make more in profits that it immediately is invested in their workers and consumers not the CEO's bonus or stock shares. Carry on fighting the good fight for these companies.
And the jobs it will create? Will that cut into the bottom line?
It's mutually beneficial for both the big businesses you hate and the politicians I loath because the end results means jobs. Someone gets off welfare for a change and can actually provide a living for their family.
I'm sorry you're right, the savings that occur after it is easier to transport energy will definitely trickle down to us. History shows us that when corporations find ways to make more in profits that it immediately is invested in their workers and consumers not the CEO's bonus or stock shares. Carry on fighting the good fight for these companies.
I'm sorry you're right, the savings that occur after it is easier to transport energy will definitely trickle down to us. History shows us that when corporations find ways to make more in profits that it immediately is invested in their workers and consumers not the CEO's bonus or stock shares. Carry on fighting the good fight for these companies.
Wonder if the people whose yard it will go through support it as much as the reps who are getting paid to push it through?
I can speak for the people that I know in the Mayflower region that were affected.
No, it's not worth it. Pipeline breaks suck.
That being said.. I think people don't give enough consideration to the long-term nature of risk that comes with a pipe-line. It may not break tomorrow or the next day.. but over a long enough timeline, eventually yes.. odds are there will be a major break and some unfortunate area will be flooded with hazardous material.
This reminds me of the waste ponds that we have built in Alaska to hold hazardous mining waste forever. Odds are anything can happen on a long enough time line.. the time line for these waste ponds are FOREVER! Basically we are guaranteed a disaster up there unless we haul that crap off to space or something
I can speak for the people that I know in the Mayflower region that were affected.
No, it's not worth it. Pipeline breaks suck.
That being said.. I think people don't give enough consideration to the long-term nature of risk that comes with a pipe-line. It may not break tomorrow or the next day.. but over a long enough timeline, eventually yes.. odds are there will be a major break and some unfortunate area will be flooded with hazardous material.
This reminds me of the waste ponds that we have built in Alaska to hold hazardous mining waste forever. Odds are anything can happen on a long enough time line.. the time line for these waste ponds are FOREVER! Basically we are guaranteed a disaster up there unless we haul that crap off to space or something
Probably, but there has to be a projected number. How much of an effect on gas prices will it have? 3¢/gal?