Keystone Pipeline - a red line?

#403
#403
VolsNSkinsFan said:
TN Ribs said:
Ronald Reagan created 1.1 million jobs in one month with a population half its current size. Your hero can barely get over 200k with huge QE
Click to expand...

I'd show you the breakdown over the last 50 years (hint: it's not even a contest) but I'm pretty sure it would well above your level of comprehension.

You should just leave the job creation to us and you worry about things like banning same-sex marriage.
Click to expand...
 
#405
#405
Hate to break it to you but the parties have changed over the past 50 years. 1.1 million jobs created in one month. Top that. You've got 2 years, good luck
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#408
#408
MDS67 said:
Your fellow socialists like Dingy Harry and Nancy Pelosi are the loons
Click to expand...

That's all you got?

Ernst has alleged that the federal government is partnering with the United Nations to force Iowans off their land and into urban cores as part of a conspiracy called Agenda 21. At a campaign event last November, she said:

All of us agreed that Agenda 21 is a horrible idea. One of those implications to Americans, again, going back to what did it does do to the individual family here in the state of Iowa, and what I've seen, the implications that it has here is moving people off of their agricultural land and consolidating them into city centers, and then telling them that you don't have property rights anymore. These are all things that the UN is behind, and it's bad for the United States and bad for families here in the state of Iowa.


Need I say more? She's out there dude.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#409
#409
TN Ribs said:
That's all you got?

Ernst has alleged that the federal government is partnering with the United Nations to force Iowans off their land and into urban cores as part of a conspiracy called Agenda 21. At a campaign event last November, she said:

All of us agreed that Agenda 21 is a horrible idea. One of those implications to Americans, again, going back to what did it does do to the individual family here in the state of Iowa, and what I've seen, the implications that it has here is moving people off of their agricultural land and consolidating them into city centers, and then telling them that you don't have property rights anymore. These are all things that the UN is behind, and it's bad for the United States and bad for families here in the state of Iowa.


Need I say more? She's out there dude.
Click to expand...


She's right about Agenda 21. The UN does want to do away with private property
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#410
#410
FLVOL69 said:
You just answered your own question.
Click to expand...

So one proposal automatically labels him as a socialist? I think the ACA addressed plenty of problems in and around the healthcare industry. Did we need a huge overhaul to do that? Nope. So let's hope the new majority figures out the best way to improve the lives of American citizens by repealing it and replacing it with something even better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#415
#415
TN Ribs said:
That's all you got?

Ernst has alleged that the federal government is partnering with the United Nations to force Iowans off their land and into urban cores as part of a conspiracy called Agenda 21. At a campaign event last November, she said:

All of us agreed that Agenda 21 is a horrible idea. One of those implications to Americans, again, going back to what did it does do to the individual family here in the state of Iowa, and what I've seen, the implications that it has here is moving people off of their agricultural land and consolidating them into city centers, and then telling them that you don't have property rights anymore. These are all things that the UN is behind, and it's bad for the United States and bad for families here in the state of Iowa.


Need I say more? She's out there dude.
Click to expand...

She used that unfounded fear to her advantage.

I wasn't a fan of Bruce Braley, but he was, IMO, the better option and wasn't a bad representative.
 
#417
#417
WooPigSooie said:
I can speak for the people that I know in the Mayflower region that were affected.

No, it's not worth it. Pipeline breaks suck.

That being said.. I think people don't give enough consideration to the long-term nature of risk that comes with a pipe-line. It may not break tomorrow or the next day.. but over a long enough timeline, eventually yes.. odds are there will be a major break and some unfortunate area will be flooded with hazardous material.

This reminds me of the waste ponds that we have built in Alaska to hold hazardous mining waste forever. Odds are anything can happen on a long enough time line.. the time line for these waste ponds are FOREVER! Basically we are guaranteed a disaster up there unless we haul that crap off to space or something
Click to expand...

That pipeline break in Mayflower was the best thing that ever happened to most of those affected.

The rest of your post is hysteria.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#421
#421
#VFL__ said:
33% of our country voted. That's not a wave, that's a motivated and calculated "push." I'm happy to see it happen though and excited to see what these new committee heads can do.
Click to expand...

And who cares what the ones that didn't vote think.

High voter turnout is not always a good thing, see 2008 and 2012.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top