Call me pretentious, but I don't really have any friends who are so mentally FUBAR that they can't hold jobs, go to school, or have social lives (or even walk dogs, dammit). It just happened that way.
I've only been up for a couple of hours, but I don't recall reading that earlier. I'll go back and check.
Anyway, I think that hostile rhetoric can do wild things to those who are already crazy enough to kill in the name of principal. As far as passive nutcases such as myself, no. I'm not going to heavily distort what I hear on the radio and use it as an excuse to murder innocent people.
Beck, Palin, the TP, and talk radio hate government. They think the current leadership overreaches to the point of being unconstitutional. They assail the treasury department and warn that our economic and monetary system is illusory and defunct.
The TP runs a candidate that says that people are going to resort to "Second Amendment remedies" against Democratic politicians who support bigger government, and specifically reference health care reform. Beck, in particular, is fond of alarmist rhetoric. Buy seeds and gold for the coming economic and social meltdown caused by the Democrats and big government. Be prepared to fight for your survival. Beck puts up chalk boards trying to draw odd linkage between words and symbols and government officials (all Dems).
This young man lives in Tuscon. The closest Democratic member of Congress there is Giffords. She just narrowly defeated a TPer who blasted her and held shooting range rallies. Her district was named by Palin as one to go after. She voted for health care reform. The shooter had been to a rally of hers and asked about symbols and words and had been ranting in other places about unconstitutional actions by government.
The shooter hates big government, the treasury, and he thinks there are conspiracies amongst government officials to deny him his constitutional rights. He buys a gun and shoots the Democratic Congresswoman at a rally five miles from his house.
Gee, can't see how anyone might suspect some connection there, somewhere.
So now we go back to the OP - there is zero evidence that the shooter listened to talk radio and some evidence that he did not.
So how is one to conclude that talk radio did anything to this guy?
In the larger sense, the LG post you agreed with in it's entirety suggested that the problem is rhetoric from the right wing and NOT the left wing. Do you agree?
I would imagine most of us responding to you see zero evidence that talk radio played a role in this particular case and dispute the notion that the right is vitriolic/hate speech while the left is not.
Beck, Palin, the TP, and talk radio hate government. They think the current leadership overreaches to the point of being unconstitutional. They assail the treasury department and warn that our economic and monetary system is illusory and defunct.
False claim - they do not hate government. They prefer a particular style of government.
The TP runs a candidate that says that people are going to resort to "Second Amendment remedies" against Democratic politicians who support bigger government, and specifically reference health care reform. Beck, in particular, is fond of alarmist rhetoric. Buy seeds and gold for the coming economic and social meltdown caused by the Democrats and big government. Be prepared to fight for your survival. Beck puts up chalk boards trying to draw odd linkage between words and symbols and government officials (all Dems).
Dems are routinely alarmist. Many claimed Bush was not their president and called for regime change - holy crap; they are expressing anger towards the government and questioning it's legitimacy.
This young man lives in Tuscon. The closest Democratic member of Congress there is Giffords. She just narrowly defeated a TPer who blasted her and held shooting range rallies. Her district was named by Palin as one to go after. She voted for health care reform. The shooter had been to a rally of hers and asked about symbols and words and had been ranting in other places about unconstitutional actions by government.
The shooter hates big government, the treasury, and he thinks there are conspiracies amongst government officials to deny him his constitutional rights. He buys a gun and shoots the Democratic Congresswoman at a rally five miles from his house.
Gee, can't see how anyone might suspect some connection there, somewhere.
I've only been up for a couple of hours, but I don't recall reading that earlier. I'll go back and check.
Anyway, I think that hostile rhetoric can do wild things to those who are already crazy enough to kill in the name of principal. As far as passive nutcases such as myself, no. I'm not going to heavily distort what I hear on the radio and use it as an excuse to murder innocent people.
You can validly attack overly harsh form the left and I will agree.
But let's not lose sight of how awful things have been from the right in particular for the last few years.
One does not excuse the other.
You are so biased it's absurd. The left was horrible during the Bush years and has continued to be. The right is likewise horrible.
Beck, Palin, the TP, and talk radio hate government. They think the current leadership overreaches to the point of being unconstitutional. They assail the treasury department and warn that our economic and monetary system is illusory and defunct.
The TP runs a candidate that says that people are going to resort to "Second Amendment remedies" against Democratic politicians who support bigger government, and specifically reference health care reform. Beck, in particular, is fond of alarmist rhetoric. Buy seeds and gold for the coming economic and social meltdown caused by the Democrats and big government. Be prepared to fight for your survival. Beck puts up chalk boards trying to draw odd linkage between words and symbols and government officials (all Dems).
This young man lives in Tuscon. The closest Democratic member of Congress there is Giffords. She just narrowly defeated a TPer who blasted her and held shooting range rallies. Her district was named by Palin as one to go after. She voted for health care reform. The shooter had been to a rally of hers and asked about symbols and words and had been ranting in other places about unconstitutional actions by government.
The shooter hates big government, the treasury, and he thinks there are conspiracies amongst government officials to deny him his constitutional rights. He buys a gun and shoots the Democratic Congresswoman at a rally five miles from his house.
Gee, can't see how anyone might suspect some connection there, somewhere.
So now we go back to the OP - there is zero evidence that the shooter listened to talk radio and some evidence that he did not.
So how is one to conclude that talk radio did anything to this guy?
In the larger sense, the LG post you agreed with in it's entirety suggested that the problem is rhetoric from the right wing and NOT the left wing. Do you agree?
I would imagine most of us responding to you see zero evidence that talk radio played a role in this particular case and dispute the notion that the right is vitriolic/hate speech while the left is not.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_a_President_(2006_film)You are so biased it's absurd. The left was horrible during the Bush years and has continued to be. The right is likewise horrible.