Lane Kiffin's 'dream job' will pay him $4 million. For ... what, again?

#101
#101
kptvol said:
I think he raises a valid point. Lots of the top coaches are douchebags. Fans don't really care if they're winning.
Click to expand...

Exactly. How many threads were posted here calling Kiffin a douchebag when he was getting a commitment from another elite player or when he was laying a 26-point beatdown on Georgia?
 
#102
#102
kptvol said:
I think he raises a valid point. Lots of the top coaches are douchebags. Fans don't really care if they're winning.
Click to expand...

I was refering to the double spelling of douchbaggery. Both being wrong, I find it hard to take the post seriously.
 
#103
#103
Cdywolfe said:
Hatvol calling someone else trash? If that's not hypocrisy I don't know what is

Lol I was reading through a thread the other day and some clown made the comment "I don't see why people try to make it personal with hat?"

He came in to this thread to call Dooley and his supporters trash and sheep. Then continued to try and support his argument by calling out people for typos.

Not really hard to figure out why people don't like him.

On a side note I ran a spell check on this(ya know don't wanna give the great Hat any ammunition) and it tried to replace hatvol with hateful. Guess they don't call these things smart phones for nothing.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...



:hi::lolabove:
 
#104
#104
kptvol said:
You're acting as if Louisiana Tech is playing against SEC competition. They aren't getting anything close to top rate players, agreed. No one they play is, either.
Click to expand...

Aren't LSU, MS ST and OLE Miss in the SEC?
Don't KS, Cal and UCLA get top rate players?

Not trying to inject any logic.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#105
#105
VOODOOVOL said:
Aren't LSU, MS ST and OLE Miss in the SEC?
Don't KS, Cal and UCLA get top rate players?

Not trying to inject any logic.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

You named 5 of his losses. He had a total of 20. Most of them were in conference.

That MSU team he beat in '08 was so awesome that they lost to an eventual 5-7 UT team by 31.
 
#106
#106
What about their in conference opponents? The best team in the conference has pulled in classes rating 62, 72, 82, and 89 in the last four years. The WAC is a joke, and the talent level is atrocious.
 
#107
#107
SGMVols said:
You named 5 of his losses. He had a total of 20. Most of them were in conference.

That MSU team he beat in '08 was so awesome that they lost to an eventual 5-7 UT team by 31.
Click to expand...


And your point?

I was reponding to some one that said LA Tech didn't play anyone with SEC/top rated talent, which is not true.

For a future engineer you don't seem to follow very well.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#109
#109
VOODOOVOL said:
And your point?

I was reponding to some one that said LA Tech didn't play anyone with SEC/top rated talent, which is not true.

For a future engineer you don't seem to follow very well.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

That's me that has that as my headline. Unless you know him and he is going to be an engineer.
 
#110
#110
tvolsfan said:
What about their in conference opponents? The best team in the conference has pulled in classes rating 62, 72, 82, and 89 in the last four years. The WAC is a joke, and the talent level is atrocious.
Click to expand...

But that won't stop people from drawing unfair early conclusions about Dooley at this point.
 
#112
#112
VOODOOVOL said:
Aren't LSU, MS ST and OLE Miss in the SEC?
Don't KS, Cal and UCLA get top rate players?

Not trying to inject any logic.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

No one is getting on Dooley for losing to those schools. Thus, the criticism for doing poorly in the WAC.
 
#114
#114
tvolsfan said:
What? Please clarify.
Click to expand...

By trying to use his record to condemn him, which you so perfectly pointed out has been created by sub-par talent and a school that has very little money to spend on anything not academic related at this point. That's what I took from your statement.
 
#115
#115
g8terh8ter_eric said:
By trying to use his record to condemn him, which you so perfectly pointed out has been created by sub-par talent and a school that has very little money to spend on anything not academic related at this point. That's what I took from your statement.
Click to expand...
I thought you were going to say people will judge him for struggling early at UT when the talent level is really low. I'd agree with that.

As far as his old job, he spent 3 years there and had time to recruit against little competition. I find it hard to be impressed.
 
#116
#116
There are several good football teams in the WAC. You calling it atrocious is ridiculous. If Dooley's team is healthy in year 3, he returned 16 starters off a team that went 8-5 and won LA Tech's first bowl win in over 30 years -- they weren't going to do things differently in year 3, they just got hit with a rash of injuries. It was an easier schedule than their previous one, they just got hit in both the starters and their immediate backups with freak injuries.

You take out year 3 and Dooley's record looks MUCH better. It's not hard to look past year 3. And he hired a Women's basketball coach while he was AD. He can handle the workload.
 
Last edited:
#117
#117
Sabanocchio said:
There are several good football teams in the WAC. You calling it atrocious is ridiculous. If Dooley's team is healthy in year 3, he returned 16 starters off a team that went 8-5 and won LA Tech's first bowl win in over 30 years -- they weren't going to do things differently in year 3, they just got hit with a rash of injuries. It was an easier schedule than their previous one, they just got hit in both the starters and their immediate backups with freak injuries.
Click to expand...
The best team in that conference pulls in recruiting classes averaging out to about 80. The conference sucks.
 
#119
#119
tvolsfan said:
The best team in that conference pulls in recruiting classes averaging out to about 80. The conference sucks.
Click to expand...

I agree with that. The biggest thing that Boise has going for it are pipelines it created when it was successful before joining the WAC. Boise has been successful for sometime, and since joining the WAC, it has proved to be successful against not only the conference, but the big boys as well. Somehow Boise transcends itself above it's conference to compete with basically anyone.
 
#120
#120
g8terh8ter_eric said:
I agree with that. The biggest thing that Boise has going for it are pipelines it created when it was successful before joining the WAC. Boise has been successful for sometime, and since joining the WAC, it has proved to be successful against not only the conference, but the big boys as well. Somehow Boise transcends itself above it's conference to compete with basically anyone.
Click to expand...
I honestly think that's more a result of them being in two BCS games where they were either overlooked or viewed as an inferior opponent in a game that was a letdown for their opponent. I'll give them credit for beating Oregon, but that was their first game with Kelly, then you have to consider how Georgia flattened them.

They do deserve some credit. They play well in their system. However, in the SEC, I think they're normally a 4 loss team at best.
 
Last edited:
#121
#121
tvolsfan said:
The best team in that conference pulls in recruiting classes averaging out to about 80. The conference sucks.
Click to expand...

It's Division I college football. You're acting like it's the FCS.

Boise State beat everyone they played. They had some quality wins.
 
Last edited:
#122
#122
g8terh8ter_eric said:
I agree with that. The biggest thing that Boise has going for it are pipelines it created when it was successful before joining the WAC. Boise has been successful for sometime, and since joining the WAC, it has proved to be successful against not only the conference, but the big boys as well. Somehow Boise transcends itself above it's conference to compete with basically anyone.
Click to expand...

Excellent post.
 
#125
#125
Two serious questions:

1. Was kiffin home schooled?

2. Does he have down syndrome.

He is the most awkward person I
have ever seen. He has the personality of a wet cat.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top