Yeah, So, it does exist, you are just talking out you hind end, as usual.
So, Trump isn't holding up the checks, by his narcissistic demand? He's an idiot and anyone defending this is worse.
It wasn't fine. There was a very clear attempt at voter suppression. Two things from that article make that clear:So the election was fine and the last minute hysteria by Dems was just that. Good to know.
One piece I heard was a reporter asking about testing. Trump kept saying that testing issues and failures were all on the states. When the reporter tried to insert a little actual truth and context, Trump rudely cut her off.
He talks sh&t and tries to manipulate the media.... if they and people against him would be quiet it wouldn’t have the effect that he wants..... I’m not on any side
It's the people who the checks are going to that are holding it up by not providing their checking account information. Easiest thing in the world to do is open a checking account. Another swing and miss
Is this your excuse for the azzkicking that is coming? Good luck.
Here is an example of how I believe Trump operates. It's a business tactic that many use. I will give you an example.
He wants the blame for any future deaths or illnesses to complete fall on someone else.
He knows that the economy is going to hit a no return point and that May is very close to the tipping point.
He knows the economy is what many vote on.
He wants to open the economy may 1st but any illness that happens in a state will fall on him.
He then makes an absurd claim he knows the media will bite on. He states that he will force the governors to reopen.
The media bite. The liberals bite. No, no, no orange man the libs will say you cant do that. State rights.
He has now pigeon holed them.
May 1st he allows the governors to reopen if THEY feel they should.
Now, any governor who doesn't their states economy is on them. Any governor who does open the illness is on them.
Illness happens or economy gets worse, either way it's on the governor's.
Media now loses it cause illnesses go up in certain states. He pulls all the comments via a tweet where the media and the governors said it was states right issue.
Economy does begin to get better and anything bad that does occur falls on the governors and not him such as NYC not opening abd their economy getting worse.
He then rallies around the governors who do reopen abd point to the stock market bounce and also how their personal state unemployment has dropped.
Media cannot blame him because all his did was give the states the rights and got it off him.
If he never makes this comment the media continues to make it all him. He has now transitioned to making it about the governors.
This is a business tactic that politicians just dont get. He is running rings around them.
Watch the next few weeks...it will all be about governors making the choices.
No it's why Republicans mysteriously lost every possible Congressional seat in a historically GOP stronghold. But it's good that you are ok with this. California will eventually step in more than they can get out of so I say carry on.
Yep that is exactly how he operates.Here is an example of how I believe Trump operates. It's a business tactic that many use. I will give you an example.
He wants the blame for any future deaths or illnesses to complete fall on someone else.
He knows that the economy is going to hit a no return point and that May is very close to the tipping point.
He knows the economy is what many vote on.
He wants to open the economy may 1st but any illness that happens in a state will fall on him.
He then makes an absurd claim he knows the media will bite on. He states that he will force the governors to reopen.
The media bite. The liberals bite. No, no, no orange man the libs will say you cant do that. State rights.
He has now pigeon holed them.
May 1st he allows the governors to reopen if THEY feel they should.
Now, any governor who doesn't their states economy is on them. Any governor who does open the illness is on them.
Illness happens or economy gets worse, either way it's on the governor's.
Media now loses it cause illnesses go up in certain states. He pulls all the comments via a tweet where the media and the governors said it was states right issue.
Economy does begin to get better and anything bad that does occur falls on the governors and not him such as NYC not opening abd their economy getting worse.
He then rallies around the governors who do reopen abd point to the stock market bounce and also how their personal state unemployment has dropped.
Media cannot blame him because all his did was give the states the rights and got it off him.
If he never makes this comment the media continues to make it all him. He has now transitioned to making it about the governors.
This is a business tactic that politicians just dont get. He is running rings around them.
Watch the next few weeks...it will all be about governors making the choices.
It wasn't fine. There was a very clear attempt at voter suppression. Two things from that article make that clear:
1) "Republican state Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald's insistence on in-person voting led to long lines in Democratic strongholds like Milwaukee, where the city reduced its planned 180 polling places to just five that were open on election day."
2) "Meanwhile, the Republican National Committee and the Republican Party of Wisconsin, acting on behalf of state legislative leaders, successfully appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court a federal judge's decision to extend the deadline for absentee ballots to be returned. The court ruled that ballots must be postmarked by election day on April 7 -- even though on the morning of the election, local clerks had not even mailed ballots to more than 11,000 people who had requested them on time."
These sort of actions can lead to a backlash when the objective is this obvious. Republicans wanted to make it as hard as possible for people in Milwaukee to vote... and they still lost an election in a battleground state.
If opening up the country is considered "absolute authority", would shutting it down the same way many states have be considered the same?