Lol. Remind me who’s “wee wee’d off?”
I’ll try to make this as simple as possible:
You’re saying, “I wasn’t changing the subject” and “I’m not a trump supporter. See? I admitted he was wrong.” Neither of those is a substantive response to what I said.
The first is literally a base conclusory statement and the other is a collateral rebuttal that attempts to use other evidence to disprove my presumption. Neither addresses the basis for my conclusion that I’ve explained so many times that I’m now being called obsessive for repeatedly trying to dumb it down for you.
Furthermore, neither of these responses passes the laugh test. Do you really expect me to keep coming up with new responses to the same stupid arguments just because you’re repeating them ad nauseum?
Your posts hammering on the media issue, despite other people still bringing up Trump, are still have been quoted back to you. Nothing else is needed. Clearly the subject was changed to the media.
You say these posts are significant because they contain criticism of Trump’s bad behavior, but those “criticisms” are just superficial, generic acknowledgments and, more importantly: what choice did you have. Defending someone caught in such an obvious lie is impossible. You can change the subject, mitigate by minimizing the significance of the lie, or both. Your posts do both, the first one was even explicit about saying the two things are equally bad.
I’ve explained why I think that was an intentional deflection. If you don’t want to make a relevant response to those explanations, then don’t, but insulting my intelligence while seemingly failing to understand what I’m saying seems self-defeating.
