Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

[Mick]

Common sense politics, not being a sheep and following 1 party blindly. Don't kill babies, don't hurt children, don't be an a$$hole, don't start pointless wars, always put America and it's citizens first, quit worrying about peoples feelings and being PC, provide opportunity NOT HANDOUTS, free college is BS, don't tell me how to raise my kids and don't be an a$$hole

You don't value not being an a$$hole:

Exhibit A:

Science

 

[Mick]

The WHO said they didn’t know.... the media acted like they were saying that the WHO was saying that Herd immunity wouldn’t work..... How is this so hard to understand? Just a question..... why do you not question the scientific community at all?

The alternative is Trumpism and conspiracy theories.

 

[Mick]

I don't trust anything that comes from Trump, I mean the Republican party, I mean Trump....

Perfect.

 

[NurseGoodVol]

Are you telling me you know more than them? lol. Cite your sources and not your anecdotal optimism.

2 pandemics, 15 years critical care, a microbiology teacher that studied level 4 viruses and worked for the cdc. No you are right, I got nothing.

 

[volbeast33]

The alternative is Trumpism and conspiracy theories.

You don’t have to vote for trump or believe in conspiracy theories.... you should question everything especially the scientific community or politicians.

 

[InVOLuntary]

I'm a pathetic sheep that gets my news from CNN and MSNBC. Deep down I'm a communist and my dream for the US is to be like China.

Perfecter

 

[Mick]

2 pandemics, 15 years critical care, a microbiology teacher that studied level 4 viruses and worked for the cdc. No you are right, I got nothing.

Seriously, this is your "citation"? You need to cite more than a resume.

 

[Dumbledorange]

no proof that one-time infection could lead to immunity

"The UN World Health Organization (WHO) has warned that there is currently no evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection."

 

[utvolpj]

no proof that one-time infection could lead to immunity

"The UN World Health Organization (WHO) has warned that there is currently no evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection."

Can anyone give a basic guideline on when to believe the Who and when to ignore? They're pretty confusing

 

[McDad]

Probably right. But that was slightly before my time as a voter. I do barely remember stuff about those elections though, mostly Ross Perot I think. I had to look him up to even remember the name.

Yep. That's the dude. He's the reason I say people voting For Bill is debatable.

 

[allvol123]

How accurate are those numbers? I don’t believe they’re accurate. Most likely fake to drive up hospital revenue. Probably was able to charge more with swine flu on the death certificate.

Oh, was there some legislation for that in 2009. Can you link?

 

[volbeast33]

no proof that one-time infection could lead to immunity

"The UN World Health Organization (WHO) has warned that there is currently no evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection."

Is there proof that they don’t have immunity?

 

[McDad]

Can anyone give a basic guideline on when to believe the Who and when to ignore? They're pretty confusing

Can look at the data coming from trustworthy countries whose outbreaks preceded ours.

 

[Weezer]

Seriously, this is your "citation"? You need to cite more than a resume.

You'd be a happier person if you pulled that stick out of your ass and quit acting like a giant douche canoe. Show a little respect to the lady.

 

[Mick]

Can anyone give a basic guideline on when to believe the Who and when to ignore? They're pretty confusing

Don't believe the information that came from China. That was all WHO had to go on initially unless you think there is some big conspiracy.

 

[Dumbledorange]

Can anyone give a basic guideline on when to believe the Who and when to ignore? They're pretty confusing

Read within the lines. Look for words like "expect" or "opinion", understand that any statement, at this point, is changeable as more data is assessed.

 

[Mick]

You'd be a happier person if you pulled that stick out of your ass and quit acting like a giant douche canoe. Show a little respect to the lady.

I don't think that is a requirement in the PF.
Example: Treatment of EL.

 

[Dumbledorange]

Is there proof that they don’t have immunity?

What do you consider proof and I can answer you.

 

[volbeast33]

Read within the lines. Look for words like "expect" or "opinion", understand that any statement, at this point, is changeable as more data is assessed.

That is science.... it changes constantly which it is best to question the science behind it.

 

[Weezer]

I don't think that is a requirement in the PF.
Example: Treatment of EL.

EL acts like an ass clown so he gets treated like an ass clown. NGV has been on the frontlines of this virus. She tries to share what she knows and you act like a giant penis.

 

[Stew Cook]

Can anyone give a basic guideline on when to believe the Who and when to ignore? They're pretty confusing

According to most on here, you can't trust what China reports to the WHO, and we can't trust what the US reports.... So, basically, if it doesn't come from Twitter from a non-MSM source, it can't be trusted.

I think if the WHO put "supposedly" before it cites any data, they might regain some credibility.

 

[Volsfaninva917]

You don't value not being an a$$hole:

Exhibit A:

That's opinion

 

[FLVOL_79]

Common sense politics, not being a sheep and following 1 party blindly. Don't kill babies, don't hurt children, don't be an a$$hole, don't start pointless wars, always put America and it's citizens first, quit worrying about peoples feelings and being PC, provide opportunity NOT HANDOUTS, free college is BS, don't tell me how to raise my kids and don't be an a$$hole

Nazi

 

[Volsfaninva917]

Can anyone give a basic guideline on when to believe the Who and when to ignore? They're pretty confusing

Only when it fits the narrative that everyone will die

 

[FLVOL_79]

According to most on here, you can't trust what China reports to the WHO, and we can't trust what the US reports.... So, basically, if it doesn't come from Twitter from a non-MSM source, it can't be trusted.

I think if the WHO put "supposedly" before it cites any data, they might regain some credibility.

Everyone in the world who isn't a communist knows that. Its literally taught in International Business 101.