luthervol
rational (x) and reasonable (y)
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 46,627
- Likes
- 19,730
There is no gun show loophole. The federal government can not regulate a transaction between 2 private individuals in a state. The feds can only regulate interstate commerce. No federal attempt at a law like that would pass Supreme Court muster.Close the gun show loophole.
Limit the number of guns that can be purchased by an individual in a given time frame.
The federal government can not regulate a transaction between 2 private individuals in a state. The feds can only regulate interstate commerce. No federal attempt at a law like that would pass Supreme Court muster.
The abuse of the gun but not the gun itself or the act of owning it. For child porn to even exist there must be a victim. Trying to equate a gun to that abhorrent act is patheticGive me a break.
The abuse of guns has true victims.
The wide spread distribution of illegal guns has true victims.
Illegal drugs have true victims.
Maybe you can, what if you increased penalties and mandatory sentences for offenders?
I’m no lawyer and am not versed in commerce case law. But it is my understanding that the “loophole” was left out of the law on purpose due to the lack of authority to regulate a private sale between 2 private individuals within a state. In that case a firearm is no different than a lawnmower in terms of what the feds have the power to regulate.I don’t think this is consistent with how the commerce clause has been interpreted by the court.
There is no gun show loophole.Close the gun show loophole.
Limit the number of guns that can be purchased by an individual in a given time frame.
Close the gun show loophole.
Limit the number of guns that can be purchased by an individual in a given time frame.
Your obviously not thinking of the children...So are the people doing these masks shootings buying the majority of their weapons at gun shows? Also, does the limit for the number of guns purchased at one time apply to all people?
Reason I ask is I currently own 21 firearms. A mixture of rifles, handguns and shotguns. I enjoy shooting my guns with my wife and our friends. Neither me, my wife nor anyone we know has ever been in trouble with the law. So why should I be restricted in the number of guns I can buy at one time?