Neil Young vs. Joe Rogan

[BP4Prez]

270 Doctors, Scientists Call Out Joe Rogan’s COVID Misinformation

Rogan last year falsely suggested young, healthy people didn’t need to be vaccinated against the disease. He later backpedaled, admitting he was a “******* moron” and “not a respected source of information, even for me.”

270?! Holy crap

And there you go, he admitted he’s a moron. Why do you care so bad what a random moron has to say? He’s never claimed to be an expert, exact opposite in fact.

 

[Rickyvol77]

Misinformation - big difference.
But of course it applies to all.

What misinformation was stated?

 

[Grand Vol]

270 Doctors, Scientists Call Out Joe Rogan’s COVID Misinformation

Rogan last year falsely suggested young, healthy people didn’t need to be vaccinated against the disease. He later backpedaled, admitting he was a “******* moron” and “not a respected source of information, even for me.”

Oh, so Joe Rogan actually did what I'm suggesting Neil Young should do? Admit they aren't an expert and were doing something based on feelz?

You should realize your post actually supports mine more than you probably thought it did when you hit submit...

 

[walkenvol]

Difference of opinion. On the Beach and Harvest are fantastic albums. Live Rust is great. CSNY is always good.

Harvest moon is on my play list

 

[MontyPython]

Oh, so Joe Rogan actually did what I'm suggesting Neil Young should do? Admit they aren't an expert and were doing something based on feelz?

You should realize your post actually supports mine more than you probably thought it did when you hit submit...

As long as listeners recognize that Rogan is purely 'infotainment', then I got no beef.

 

[luthervol]

What misinformation was stated?

No idea, I would have to look it up.
Like I said earlier, I didn't even know who he was, I had certainly never listened to him.

 

[SamRebel35]

As long as listeners recognize that Rogan is purely 'infotainment', then I got no beef.

Same with CNN.

 

[Grand Vol]

As long as listeners recognize that Rogan is purely 'infotainment', then I got no beef.

I believe the same should be applied to CNN, MSNBC and Fauci's briefings.

 

[MontyPython]

I believe the same should be applied to CNN, MSNBC and Fauci's briefings.

Fauci is infotainment? Heh. Mmmkkay.

 

[Grand Vol]

Fauci is infotainment? Heh. Mmmkkay.

How many other "experts" can be a wrong as he's been and still get a national audience?

 

[luthervol]

Same with CNN.

People should understand what they are getting........
Static Media Bias Chart - Ad Fontes Media

 

[SamRebel35]

Fauci is infotainment? Heh. Mmmkkay.

Yes he is. How many times has he been caught lying or been wrong during all of this? Misinformation is only a problem when it isn't from CNN I guess.

 

[KB5252]

Fauci is infotainment? Heh. Mmmkkay.

Given his track record he is dangerously close, agenda driven messaging often at odds with science and fact.

 

[Wireless1]

Rogan is the same as Howard Stern, Dr Phil (PhD in Clinical Psychology) Oprah, Jerry Springer, Johnny Carson and for some of us Phil Donahue, he interviews people. Some of the people they interview are quacks, some enlightening......but all for the entertainment....

 

[Vol8188]

270 Doctors, Scientists Call Out Joe Rogan’s COVID Misinformation

Rogan last year falsely suggested young, healthy people didn’t need to be vaccinated against the disease. He later backpedaled, admitting he was a “******* moron” and “not a respected source of information, even for me.”

So we are upset because he told the truth? How many dead people under 18 in Knox county do you think there are from COVID? What about East TN as a whole?

 

[Vol8188]

Rogan is the same as Howard Stern, Dr Phil (PhD in Clinical Psychology) Oprah, Jerry Springer, Johnny Carson and for some of us Phil Donahue, he interviews people. Some of the people they interview are quacks, some enlightening......but all for the entertainment....

He's the Larry King of our time. It's the best comparison I can come up with.

 

[MontyPython]

How many other "experts" can be a wrong as he's been and still get a national audience?

SEE: Trump circa 2016-2020.

 

[Vol8188]

No one wants to limit discussion, only intentional and harmful misinformation.

That means "limiting discussion". What you're saying right now is "listen only to the approved experts" and "no other experts should be allowed to speak out".

 

[hog88]

SEE: Trump circa 2016-2020.

^^When you realize you lost an argument but just have to have the last word.

 

[apevol]

He's the Larry King of our time. It's the best comparison I can come up with.

hes Oprah for men

 

[luthervol]

That means "limiting discussion". What you're saying right now is "listen only to the approved experts" and "no other experts should be allowed to speak out".

They should not be listened to if they are knowingly providing harmful misinformation.
Spotify can decide what they allow.
As can Facebook, Twitter, etc....
Just as Fox can decide what "experts" they wish to allow on their network.

 

[Vol8188]

They should not be listened to if they are knowingly providing harmful misinformation.
Spotify can decide what they allow.
As can Facebook, Twitter, etc....
Just as Fox can decide what "experts" they wish to allow on their network.

So we shouldn't listen to doctors unless they follow an approved narrative?

I could call vaccinating and masking children "harmful misinformation" and provide data to back those things up. Should we ban people who promote that?

 

[Vol8188]

hes Oprah for men

Oprah has more production value. I like the Larry King example because it's just a conversation.

 

[Wireless1]

They should not be listened to if they are knowingly providing harmful misinformation.
Spotify can decide what they allow.
As can Facebook, Twitter, etc....
Just as Fox can decide what "experts" they wish to allow on their network.

Anthony Fauci and masks circa March 2020?

 

[hog88]

They should not be listened to if they are knowingly providing harmful misinformation.
Spotify can decide what they allow.
As can Facebook, Twitter, etc....
Just as Fox can decide what "experts" they wish to allow on their network.

So Faucci and Justice Sotomyer shouldn't be listened to?