My guess, based on info here, at what happened:
A group of boosters wanted Joh Gruden as coach. The Haslems, Currie and Davenport feigned support of the initiative. The booster group proceed to gauge Gruden's interest and what it would take to get him to UT. They came to general agreement over three weeks ago and even celebrated the agreement on Wednesday in Dunwoody, GA two weeks ago. While legal matters were being worked out, the Haslems, Currie and Davenport were pursuing their own agenda to maintain complete control of UT athletics. The Haslems, thinking they alone know what is best for UT, were enamored with Schiano when he previously interviewed for the Browns coaching job(this was before the release of the previously sealed testimony of the Sandusky case implicating Schiano, thus the lack of due diligence on Schiano, because they had already vetted him). They thought he was a better fit for UT than Gruden. They knew they couldn't sell Schiano to the other boosters, so they kept Currie and Davenport on a short leash and thought they could have the deal done before the other boosters could do anything about it. Once announced, the other boosters would be obliged to support their new coach. It would have worked except a member of the AD staff leaked the deal to other boosters and they mobilized the support of the UT BOT and legislators.
I don't have any inside info on that side of the equation, but they HAVE to be scrambling big time now to figure out something, and I hope they fail at whatever plan is in store for us next, change is needed
Retaining Hoke for a full season is probably our best option right now
I don't think they are scrambling, I honestly don't think they care. Haslam obviously doesn't give a **** other than what her personally wants and Currie is just doing what his master is telling him to do. I don't think Currie gets fired and I don't think we make a hire for a couple of weeks and it will be some other clown that has no business coaching.
I don't think they are scrambling, I honestly don't think they care. Haslam obviously doesn't give a **** other than what her personally wants and Currie is just doing what his master is telling him to do. I don't think Currie gets fired and I don't think we make a hire for a couple of weeks and it will be some other clown that has no business coaching.
In way over his head....
My guess, based on info here, at what happened:
A group of boosters wanted Joh Gruden as coach. The Haslems, Currie and Davenport feigned support of the initiative. The booster group proceed to gauge Gruden's interest and what it would take to get him to UT. They came to general agreement over three weeks ago and even celebrated the agreement on Wednesday in Dunwoody, GA two weeks ago. While legal matters were being worked out, the Haslems, Currie and Davenport were pursuing their own agenda to maintain complete control of UT athletics. The Haslems, thinking they alone know what is best for UT, were enamored with Schiano when he previously interviewed for the Browns coaching job(this was before the release of the previously sealed testimony of the Sandusky case implicating Schiano, thus the lack of due diligence on Schiano, because they had already vetted him). They thought he was a better fit for UT than Gruden. They knew they couldn't sell Schiano to the other boosters, so they kept Currie and Davenport on a short leash and thought they could have the deal done before the other boosters could do anything about it. Once announced, the other boosters would be obliged to support their new coach. It would have worked except a member of the AD staff leaked the deal to other boosters and they mobilized the support of the UT BOT and legislators.
The best option right now is to relieve John Currie from is duties post haste. Insert Blackburn as soon as possible. Have a sit down talk with the Haslams. Be courteous, explain that they are more than welcome to donate like everyone else, but they no longer have complete control of the football program. Give Blackburn whatever he needs to make a successful hire whether that is Gruden, Peterson, Cutcliff, or someone else he sees fit.
I don't think they are scrambling, I honestly don't think they care. Haslam obviously doesn't give a **** other than what her personally wants and Currie is just doing what his master is telling him to do. I don't think Currie gets fired and I don't think we make a hire for a couple of weeks and it will be some other clown that has no business coaching.
First, as a UT alum, I am proud of Vol Nation for standing up yesterday for the essence of what UT really is. Great moment in history.
Second, something is bothering me about what happened. Things felt very choreographed yesterday. Gruden article comes out. Then immediately, news leaks of Currie to Columbus, then negotiations with Schiano. There is an immediate backlash on social media and then protests on campus. Then, within hours the deal is announced as dead and there is no statement at all from the AD? What AD kills a deal within hours based on fan backlash? What AD, in our image-control society, doesnt issue a statement for damage control?
This just seems very weird to me. Would really like an insiders take on all this. I hope that you insiders keep posting and dont listen to thise trying to call you out. You people brought the info you had. Would love some more info now, please.