True. Blaming Peyton for negotiating a better deal on his contract takes a similar logic to those who blame Fulmer for negotiating a better deal on his contract. The object of the game in such negotiations is to secure the best outcome for your side regardless of what ultimately happens. It seems Peyton won that and Irsay lost. Irsay should quit whinning over paying Peyton and still having the option to keep him again.
My guess is a lot of teams would trade the past decade they had without PM for the results and revenues they could have earned if they had him. It's simple economics. Peyton made the man a fortune and he's whinning about that.
Moreover, PM is the only player on the planet who has been negotiating for less money than his market value... including the contract that Irsay is whinning about now.
Details of current contract that Irsay is whinning about...
Indianapolis Colts' Peyton Manning signs five-year, $90 million deal - ESPN
Several of these blogs.. but like this one's title as it sums up PM's sacrafices for Irsay's Colts...
Peyton Manning Is All About the Team
Irsay wasn't quite as lost concerning PM's value to the team in 2004. With PM (and all else the same), the Colts would have won 10 or more games this past season. Add players in the right positions around PM and they're back in the playoffs with a shot at Super Bowls for the balance of PM's career (3-4 years).
2004 Contract negotiations:
USATODAY.com - Colts, Manning agree on record contract
Irsay just fired the guy who was smart enough to pick and retain Peyton. At this point, his new guy appears to be a total idiot... much like Irsay. If it's about economics, say that... and move on or be prepared for public humilation that will accompany the next several losing seasons. You're only making matters worse.
PRO FOOTBALL - Polian Handling All the Details For the Colts - NYTimes.com