golfballs
Mostly Peaceful Poster
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 75,414
- Likes
- 57,668
So the stories being talked about on the radio this morning are:
1. What happened to Ray Gricar?
Rar Gricar was the Center County DA who disappeared in 2005. His body and the harddrive from his laptop have never been found. The Sandusky case was one of his, perhaps his biggest at the time. Could his disappearance be linked? (That is, did Sandusky have him murdered--for the record my money would be on Dottie aka Sarge Sandusky)
2. Why has the McCreary victim never been identified?
No one bothered to identify the kid at the time, but it shouldn't be too hard to determine if a 2nd Mile kid was with Sandusky in the timeframe and then try to locate him now. They've tried without any success so the speculation is that maybe that kid is gone along with Gricar, as after all Sandusky knew there was a witness.
All of this is pure speculation, but would it change anyone's views on the subject if there were murders involved and covered up as well? Doesn't change my opinion at this point, they need to go down hard.
I think the circumstances around the District Attorney are very strange (I never even considered the victim McCreary observed), and if murder were to be proven I believe it would spell the death penalty for Sandusky.
However, I don't think he'd be willing to be killed (Pennsylvania has only killed people who have waived their appeal) so he'd just die on death row, much like he will currently die in prison. Moot point, really.
I think the circumstances around the District Attorney are very strange (I never even considered the victim McCreary observed), and if murder were to be proven I believe it would spell the death penalty for Sandusky.
However, I don't think he'd be willing to be killed (Pennsylvania has only killed people who have waived their appeal) so he'd just die on death row, much like he will currently die in prison. Moot point, really.
Best line regarding the Joe Paterno statue...
came from Mike Rosenberg, senior writer for Sports Illustrated:
"Penn State should keep the Joe Paterno statue. Just move it so he is looking the other way."
No it doesn't. If there is the reasonable expectation that control via knowledge was expected, they remain culpable. There is no freaking way they should be absolved if the president was in on the coverup.
By turning a blind PSU leadership allowed for other little boys to be raped but now there's a question whether or not it led to a murdser and you say moot point? Really?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
The president isn't a member of the BOT, he reports to them. In this case, he didn't mislead them, he kept them from finding out.
There may be more to the story, and there may have been willfull blindness on the part of the BOT. But the Freeh Report doesn't indicate that.
We, the Penn State BOT failed in our obligation to provide proper oversight to the universities operations. To be absolutely clear, we are accountable here
Listen to what Frazier says and I will quote it
If thats not admitting that they failed to control the situation, I dont know what else can be said to change your mind
...pretty much what they do already. It's why so many who actually serve their time have trouble trying to readjust to the real world/try to find some way to go back
Really? It looked more like what he was saying was:
Sandusky is already in jail for life. If he were to have murdered someone, apparently by Pennsylvania rule if he would have to waive some appeal in order for them to use the death penalty. So more than likely - either way - Sandusky'd just be in jail for life.
...pretty much what they do already. It's why so many who actually serve their time have trouble trying to readjust to the real world/try to find some way to go back
As far as Sandusky goes, I see that. But my point is that Sandusky is not the only guilty party here. PSU is guilty as well and if by covering up the rape of little boys and if people were murdered then PSU has culpability in that as well.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
What if it was found that he paid someone with is settlement money? He got something like $170k settlement, would the use of PSU money for something like that change your opinion of what should happen to the school?
As far as Sandusky goes, I see that. But my point is that Sandusky is not the only guilty party here. PSU is guilty as well and if by covering up the rape of little boys and if people were murdered then PSU has culpability in that as well.
Posted via VolNation Mobile