Titans Fan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 1,166
- Likes
- 2,305
While I agree with the overall sentiment, I believe Dooley stepped into a better situation than Jones.
Dooley had senior WR in Jones and Moore to go along with Hunter and Rogers coming in.
He also had a more proven defense in the secondary and the defensive line. Lathers and Reviez also provided some leadership at LB. Not saying they are any better but depth and experience wise, the starting lineup in 2010 was better.
Jones will have been well worth the money for this year if he puts up a 7 win regular season.
I am NOT comparing apples to oranges. You won't find many more apples to apples comparisons in CFB than the one between Jones' opportunity in '13 compared to Dooley's in '10. The schedules are similar. Jones inherits a better situation and appears to be a better coach. He certainly has a better resume coming in.
Too much roster turnover and lack of continuity? That was much worse 3 years ago too. The ONLY quality OL Dooley inherited bolted. Kiffin had just the year before performed a roster purge of guys he didn't want to go forward with who might have contributed for another coach. Talented players were still being lost to off the field problems.
Fulmer had just recently been fired after letting program discipline descend into the lower regions of hades. He had virtually lost the ability to recruit players with talent who could stay eligible in the numbers needed to sustain an even mid-level SEC program.
You are either vastly overestimating the problems Jones has inherited or vastly underestimating how bad the program was 3 and 4 years ago.
Yes. The right coach will make a difference right away. It takes talent to go from the bottom to the top. It takes depth of talent. UT lacks the second for sure. But to go from 5 wins to 7 is VERY MUCH within the range of difference a good coach can make over a bad one.
I probably should just start cutting and pasting when the same ol' crap is presented by those excusing Jones for potentially winning less than six games.
Keeps coming up... I keep answering it. Hopefully I will get around to everyone eventually. :loco:
Doubtful... Our fr corner may have a long afternoon..
I've said this before that if our boys are looking ahead to Oregon and take WKU lightly, then they could be in for a hard lesson. However, if they come to play football, then I'm not worried about a guy who averaged less than 5 ypc against Kentucky.
I don't think 6 wins is going to be an issue. However, this game is close enough that a turnover or two in the wrong area could cost us the game. Hard to coach holding on to the ball when it's hit just right. We win by 17 but if we don't I'm not ready to hang butch just yet.
Outside Vol Nation people think its a 2 TD game. So you think its closer than that? :ermm:
I do. I think the drop off in the secondary from our 1s to 2s is scary and Petrino knows how to exploit that. Keep in mind, his recruiting classes are Arky were full of 3* talent, and he went 10-3 and 11-2 in his last two years there. He knows how to get more out of less better than anybody. I mean, if we're playing walk ons on our secondary, how much worse can you get?? Don't think we'll lose, but I bet its closer than most think.
Poorly? He was triple teamed most of his limited time in the game. Dan is a 3 down guy, and he only had 4 plays before the score was 14-0, 7 plays before it was 21-0 and 11 plays the first quarter. AP moved the ball well when he sat in the 2nd quarter as evinced by their drive to a FG attempt. He was inserted when they were at the 14 and he pressured the QB every time. His total number of plays for the 2nd quarter was only 7, and for the game, 18.
After the first play, AP did not run the ball anywhere near him. He also never saw action the second half.
He makes the rest of the team better by freeing them up. Several plays, against the spread, he was the lone interior lineman and he was enough. Dan played well.
I think many of those concerned about the Worley performance may be confusing some of Peterman's throws with Worley. 3 throws were not dead on, and only 2 misses. Not bad. Peterman was throwing behind the receiver most of the time.
Just my .02 worth after watching the replay closely.
WKU was 18-28 for 203 yards passing against KY. Not exactly overwhelming against a not so good KY team. Did not see the game but what I heard was they most threw short underneath stuff and KY had trouble tackling. Maybe they open up against Vols?