In order of likelihood: USCe, UGA, UF.You keep harping on 7 or 8 win roster as if no other variables are in play.
AP, WKU, S Bama, Missouri, Auburn, Kentucky, Vandy ---- best case scenario. Where is number 8?
It is common but invalid to assume no one else has roster issues. USCe probably has less experienced depth than UT. They have more experience but likely less talent at WR. I wouldn't trade UT's OL for theirs under any circumstance. They are a beatable team and it won't take a heculean effort.
UGA has talent but they have alot of young and inexperienced players starting or in the two deep.
UF started with very solid depth but have been hit with a couple of significant injuries.
There are three QB's on the roster that he recruited... he chose the 4th one to start.Pretty ridiculous rubric for assessing a coach in his first year, with none of his own players, and a terrible quarterback that doesn't fit what he does.
Winning 7 games is a "ridiculous rubric"? Why? Because you say so? If I were asking for the East then that would be "ridiculous". If I were suggesting he should beat multiple teams that clearly have more talent... that wouldn't be reasonable. But I don't think expecting the "right coach" to outcoach someone is a "ridiculous rubric".
But by all means, Butch certainly may not be the guy for the job.
Give me a break.
So you are saying he definitely is? There's no doubt. Forget about expecting actual results before making that grand declaration, right?