He wasn't "terrible". Hell where was his help? Defense couldn't stop a dadgum thing. Offensive can't block. Recovers fumble balls. What else you want the man to do? Run the ball? Play safety? Play special teams?
Defense beats offense just about every time.. The Bronco oline made no adjustments. Never chipped the end coming around.. That was a great game plan by Seattle. Denver had no answers.
I think the only way you beat that defense is with bigger more physical receivers. You have to actually block someone on the line and give the QB time also. That was pitiful.
Decker and Welker are route runners. Neither are very physical.. They played robber on those crossing routes and took that crap away. A more physical guy runs through that. That got stonewalled..Bigger, more physical receivers? They're 6'3 230, 6'3 215 and 6'5 250. Welker's the only small guy. Their size and ability to be physical with the Seahawks' secondary was considered a strength and one of the reasons why the Broncos could win going into the game.
I do agree with you about the OL though....they were horrible, beginning with the first play snap from the center. The Broncos were bad all the way around .... including Peyton.
Oh yeah.. He had a bad night. Mostly because of Seattle's defense was one step ahead of him. Played faster also. Seattle was the better team period.. Denver got exposed.Look, last night doesn't change the fact that Peyton is a top 5 QB all-time, and that's coming from a person that's not a huge fan of him.
However, why is nobody here giving at least a little bit of blame to Peyton for that offensive performance? I mean, he is essentially calling the plays and handling the ball every play, so at some point, he has to take a little blame for it, doesn't he?
Imo this loss isn't Manning's fault and whoever said he has had a good supporting cast his whole career is dead wrong.
Oh yeah.. He had a bad night. Mostly because of Seattle's defense was one step ahead of him. Played faster also. Seattle was the better team period.. Denver got exposed.
Did we watch the same game? Wait you are one of those if Denver would have won it was all Manning, but since they lost it's not Manning's fault?
You are dead wrong saying that Manning is not to blame partially (it is a team sport so one person can't take the blame). He looked awful when he was under pressure and overthrew several passes (one that should have been a touchdown). I love Manning just as much as anyone. I think he is the greatest regular season QB ever, but in the post-season he is way down that list.
Manning can't complain about not having weapons this year. I'm the biggest Manning supporter ever, but Pete Carroll just owned the Broncos. Manning struggles with pressure, really bad now after his neck injury, and the Seahawks put the hurt on him. The biggest issues with the Broncos is their o-line was vastly overrated coming into the playoffs, and everyone knew their secondary was terrible. The Seahawks simply took advantage of the weaknesses of the Broncos and it worked. It also helped that their special teams got a huge boost with Harvin. It is what it is, but for the first time I just think Manning looked like it was over for him.
He was far from terrible. He got harrassed every time he dropped back. If anyone was terrible it was his o-line. His WR's also got owned.
He does deserve some blame but not all.
No doubt about that; the Seattle defense played about the best game I've ever seen in the Super Bowl.
I just don't like how a lot of Vol fans are quick to lump most of, if not all the success on Peyton, but don't give him most of the blame when things go bad.
getting hit while throwing happens to every qb. The first was on him but trying to pin the 2nd on him is pretty weak