UT IE 95
Against the Grain
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2006
- Messages
- 10,083
- Likes
- 292
Alabama fans are ridiculous. If they were breaking the rules then they can't complain about getting caught. Fulmer is as honest as they come and a true class act. If we were cheating It would not bother me one bit if we got "ratted out." They make rules for a reason. As a college football coach it was Fulmer's responsibility to reveal what he knew, just as any other coach should. They are just mad because we are a big rival of theres. As much as they like to think Fulmer is a rat they know he is 10 times the class act of any coach they've had. With all of the recruits UT and Bama battle for year to year it was a lot more likely to be Fulmer than another coach. Its not like he was out to get them. But at the same time you can't just sit there and let your biggest rival break the rules while you play fair. Get a clue. God I can't wait to drill them in Neyland this year! We have it out for Bama this year, Fulmer will have our boys ready to rip someones head off.
The damage this could cause PR-wise is pretty significant. Especially if the media is allowed into the deposition, which is a possibility. Even if they aren't, you can bet that ESPN and CNN/SI will stake this one out and be all over Fulmer and the lawyers about what goes on in it.
My thought on media presence is that the NCAA can, and probably should, argue for some level of confidentiality in order to protect their investigative processes.
I am talking about a proprietary business interest in the way that they conduct internal investigations.Isn't the investigation long since closed?
Guys, overall, what is going on here? Is this a serious lawsuit to which CPF is a witness or is this just some sort of shennanigans?
Isn't the investigation long since closed?
Guys, overall, what is going on here? Is this a serious lawsuit to which CPF is a witness or is this just some sort of shennanigans?
thanks for the perspective vestvol./2 Sometimes you take an adverse witnesses depo to nail down their testimony before trial, but in this case they have already tried this case. The case was remanded by the court of appeals. The NCAA did not call Fulmer as a witness.
3. For this to make sense they would have to prove that the NCAA knew Fulmer was lying or they had reason to know he was lying.