which is fine. I would rather take what I have now and look for answers than just assume they were all written down a couple thousand years ago and that's that.
the only thing that's consistent is that man wrote and manipulated the Bible to its current version.
All you are doing is using the book to prove itself which really doesn't work.
I wrote a long follow up to your previous question but it won't let me post it. Tried everything I know to do, not sure what the problem is. If this goes through I'll try a new one.
I would rather investigate the testimonies that actually claim the ability to make truth claims, as opposed to follow those who claim that they can't make truth claims. The Bible has been the best I've found. We can agree to disagree.
The Bible is the best attested literary work in the history of humanity. The fact that we have so many ancient copies to study, from such a long period of ancient history, and from so many disparate locales, is pretty much a guarantee that it has not been manipulated.
As a matter of fact, if I were a supreme being wanting to reveal my testimony over an extended period of time, in such a way that it couldn't be manipulated, while still allowing plausible deniability for those choosing not to follow it, I couldn't imagine a better way to do it.
Is that another way to say that I am studying what it says about itself to come to a proper understanding? If so, thank you. If not, you've missed all the times in this thread that I've said:
I am not trying to prove God.
I am merely trying to show Christianity as an internally consistent worldview.
:hi:
all you basically said is that you believe man's view of God. There is nothing else to go on. You can study the Bible all you want but it is still man's view wrapped around historical events
Did you see my follow-up post? I'm not saying you need to believe the Bible. But did you see the connection from NT to OT that actually correlated the points?
Obviously, feel free to consider it a reach; I just wanted you to know where I reached from, and to...
Ok I'll try this one more time. Briefly, while I agree the tabernacle scriptures you quoted are symbolic of something of greater spiritual significance, I think limiting it to the person of Jesus doesn't do it justice. Isn't it just as possible that Jesus' role as mediator also is symbolic of that greater truth? Especially in light of his own words stating..."know ye not that ye are gods?" (I know he was quoting also), and "all that I do, you can do also", and "the kingdom of heaven is within you". Could it be that his role as mediator was metaphorical, and that the true temple and holy of holies is within the human body? Where was he when he was crucified?
If I offended you, I sincerely apologize.
last thing i'm trying to do is get into this "debate" or whatever it is...
but isn't the fact that jc died on the cross, like the whole point of christianity?
Nah, I can assure you that didn't happen. I just find discussions quoting scripture or the Bible aren't usually worth having unless you truly believe them. I'm fine when discussing the division between it and govt but should have known it would go further. I shouldn't have jumped in at all
Your current president. I think I heard that somewhere
Ok I'll try this one more time. Briefly, while I agree the tabernacle scriptures you quoted are symbolic of something of greater spiritual significance, I think limiting it to the person of Jesus doesn't do it justice. Isn't it just as possible that Jesus' role as mediator also is symbolic of that greater truth? Especially in light of his own words stating..."know ye not that ye are gods?" (I know he was quoting also), and "all that I do, you can do also", and "the kingdom of heaven is within you". Could it be that his role as mediator was metaphorical, and that the true temple and holy of holies is within the human body? Where was he when he was crucified?
Really, WOW the president of all americans is Muslum? Many times I have heard him say he is a Christian, maybe he is lying? I dont think so, but now that I think of it, does it matter? Christian, Muslum, Hindu, Catholic, Baptist, Jew. As long as they defend the constitiution, that is all I care about. :thumbsup:
Nah, I can assure you that didn't happen. I just find discussions quoting scripture or the Bible aren't usually worth having unless you truly believe them. I'm fine when discussing the division between it and govt but should have known it would go further. I shouldn't have jumped in at all