TennNC
a lover, not a fighter
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2006
- Messages
- 5,669
- Likes
- 0
we don't want Buffet setting tax policy. We want Buffet evaluating investments.I think that we learned yesterday that even economist can make big mistakes. If we are investing 700 billion plus dollars into the market then Buffet is the man we want watching the hen house which I understood was a possibility of choice by both candidates.
1) we don't want Buffet setting tax policy. We want Buffet evaluating investments.
2) He wants to head up the newly privatized SS admin, I'm 100% in support. He wants to head the Fed, no thanks.
oh, i get it now....stay on talking point...gotcha
you might be surprised at the type of dampening effect huge piles of SS bucks would have on the markets.2) I don't have a strong opinion on privatizing SS. I want what works. But would we not be screwed right now if SS were privatized with millions of Boomers retiring?
nope - it's your assumption that BO as president will "cripple business." As if he has stated that as his platform.
It's like thinking that Steve Spurrier was the antichrist when he was whipping our asses all those years. It's much more difficult to admit that he was simply a much, much, much, much, much better coach than ours.
2) I don't have a strong opinion on privatizing SS. I want what works. But would we not be screwed right now if SS were privatized with millions of Boomers retiring?
Please explain? What you mean? Unfortunately SS will always be a government problem not matter what form it takes.
I found this pair of sentences a bit confusing.